User reputation system - Page 2

pooper200000 · #41 09-21-2006, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huwajux

I'd enjoy a reputation system. Would be nice to see how I can improve. :P

The best csn't improve though

I never said you were the best though

MysticX2X · #42 09-22-2006, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by excaliber7388

Only because you have the lowest rep (by far) on some other forum

Is that supposed to be an insult because you terribly failed. And i know im not the only one, i especially know quite a few do it to you.

Draenin · #43 09-22-2006, 02:45 AM

I'd want a negative reputation. It just works out better in the long run.

pooper200000 · #44 09-22-2006, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin

I'd want a negative reputation. It just works out better in the long run.

Yes it does probaly

Tom · #45 09-22-2006, 12:03 PM

lol I can imagine someone seeing they got a -1 rep point from someone, they see who it is and then give them a -1 back lol.

unixmad · #46 09-23-2006, 05:50 PM

I will validate the system today as an experimentation for 1 month.

Sam · #47 09-23-2006, 05:55 PM

Nice

WanDaMan · #48 09-23-2006, 06:03 PM

Lovely.

unixmad · #49 09-23-2006, 06:05 PM

Administrators are adding or substracting 10 points then be nice with them

WanDaMan · #50 09-23-2006, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unixmad

Administrators are adding or substracting 10 points then be nice with them

That's an awfully attractive account name you have there.

smirt362 · #51 09-23-2006, 07:37 PM

Is there anyway to check your own reputation and see what comments you get?
And...could you add something (or is something allready added) to notify you when you get reputation from someone?

Damix2 · #52 09-23-2006, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unixmad

Administrators are adding or substracting 10 points then be nice with them

Well that seems dumb...

KuJi · #53 09-23-2006, 07:49 PM

Lets all negative sam and darlene!

unixmad · #54 09-23-2006, 07:49 PM

It seems you have been the first the receive a reputation from me, i am not so surprised by it anyway... Even if i agree that i should reduce the number of point that admin give/substracte, there are better way to say it.

I Will focus on giving positive reputation now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

Well that seems dumb...

KuJi · #55 09-23-2006, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unixmad

It seems you have been the first the receive a reputation from me, i am not so surprised by it anyway...

I Will focus on giving positive reputation now.

Lol, unixmad is tooo funny =P

k0rupt_ed · #56 09-23-2006, 08:19 PM

*give unixmad one positive*

Darlene159 · #57 09-23-2006, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

That's an awfully attractive account name you have there.

haha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

Well that seems dumb...

You should really state why you disagree with something, instead of just saying "that's dumb"

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi

Lets all negative sam and darlene!

Quote:

Originally Posted by unixmad

It seems you have been the first the receive a reputation from me, i am not so surprised by it anyway... Even if i agree that i should reduce the number of point that admin give/substracte, there are better way to say it.

I Will focus on giving positive reputation now.

Yea, I think that is a bit high, it should only be slightly higher then normal if you want it to be higher.

Draenin · #58 09-23-2006, 08:43 PM

I'm looking forward to being the black hole of the forums. >:}

Darlene159 · #59 09-23-2006, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin

I'm looking forward to being the black hole of the forums. >:}

Pfft, I already got negative rep points for a very stupid reason.

Draenin · #60 09-23-2006, 08:47 PM

Being Moonie?

Darlene159 · #61 09-23-2006, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin

Being Moonie?

lol, no...but I am sure that one is coming

Draenin · #62 09-23-2006, 08:52 PM

It's a toss up on who's gotten into more severe fights so far between you and me. You have the ability to settle 'em. I usually have to wait 'til I've verbally bloodied noses and knocked out an entire row of teeth before things get settled.

So, in a way, I sorta have to earn my scars, whereas they sometimes come to you simply because of what place you hold in the community.

WanDaMan · #63 09-23-2006, 08:56 PM

It'd be cool if you could implement the AP system on Graal on to the forums. This new feature you've just added would go perfectly with the idea imho.

100ap - Good Reputation ; Gold User Name
50ap - Good & Bad Reputation ; Blue User Name
0ap - Bad Reputation ; Red User Name

Darlene159 · #64 09-23-2006, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

It'd be cool if you could implement the AP system on Graal on to the forums. This new feature you've just added would go perfectly with the idea imho.

100ap - Good Reputation ; Gold User Name
50ap - Good & Bad Reputation ; Blue User Name
0ap - Bad Reputation ; Red User Name

As long as people don't take it too seriously.

Crono · #65 09-23-2006, 09:00 PM

yeah on the other forums i dont even care, hell I even WANT people to negative rep me :P

Draenin · #66 09-23-2006, 09:01 PM

It'd be neat if the name colors changed, too with the AP bar, like on classic servers. Moderators, GSTs, and so on could be denoted with special icons that take place of the online status or something similar to that.

WanDaMan · #67 09-23-2006, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin

It'd be neat if the name colors changed, too with the AP bar, like on classic servers.

That's what I meant

Nice suggestion =D!

Damix2 · #68 09-23-2006, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You should really state why you disagree with something, instead of just saying "that's dumb"

You should really not tell the customer what to do.

Googi · #69 09-23-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

only a few will abuse it, and they will be the same ones getting a low reputation and many infractions

Or, evidently, they will be admins.

zephirot · #70 09-23-2006, 10:31 PM

Oh, the rep system is up :O

Zero Hour · #71 09-23-2006, 10:35 PM

I would have liked it a lot more if you could use this function more than ONCE every TWENTY FOUR hours.

Damix2 · #72 09-23-2006, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

I would have liked it a lot more if you could use this function more than ONCE every TWENTY FOUR hours.

This other forum, that might be related to this one, but I won't name any names, did the system better.

Googi · #73 09-23-2006, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

This other forum, that might be related to this one, but I won't name any names, did the system better.

He is talking, of course, about the Digital Point forums.

Minoc · #74 09-23-2006, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

I would have liked it a lot more if you could use this function more than ONCE every TWENTY FOUR hours.

Agreed.

Sam · #75 09-23-2006, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

I would have liked it a lot more if you could use this function more than ONCE every TWENTY FOUR hours.

No, I don't think it would be good. It would make the users starting a reputation fight.

Darlene159 · #76 09-23-2006, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam

No, I don't think it would be good. It would make the users starting a reputation fight.

Agreed

Minoc · #77 09-23-2006, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam

No, I don't think it would be good. It would make the users starting a reputation fight.

How come? The name of the reputation giver is not revealed.

Sam · #78 09-23-2006, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minoc

How come? The name of the reputation giver is not revealed.

Yes, but that doesn't stop some ppl. to revenge on someone who post something he dont want to hear.

Minoc · #79 09-23-2006, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam

Yes, but that doesn't stop some ppl. to revenge on someone who post something he dont want to hear.

Yet it'd hardly be a "reputation fight".
Setting a limit of two per day couldn't possibly cause much harm.

Sam · #80 09-23-2006, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minoc

Yet it'd hardly be a "reputation fight".
Setting a limit of two per day couldn't possibly cause much harm.

Thats true it wouldnt cause harm. I would agree to a limit of two per day, if its 1 point for a good and 1 point for a bad rep. But at the moment we are in a test, so we will see how things are going in general.