Its time to listen.

Damix2 · #1 07-03-2005, 02:15 AM

Before you start reading, I want you all to check your egos at the door and just listen, there will be plenty of time for discussion later.

I was gone for 2 days and I come back to the war on Bel'la Olplyn, Etien doing god knows what. Kefkin summoning some water god, Brad insulting the whole staff team. Did I miss anything?

Lets address everything seperatly.

This war on Bel'la Olplyn. I'm for it, hell I even support it, I like to see the activity this has spawned. But for godsakes could we please be a little more civilized? I log on to see the Zormite Republic declaring victory with no BO members on. I understand that the RP team OK'ed the war, I understand that the time has been there, but you can't have a war without him on. He doesn't have to agree to the war, but he has to have the right to defend himself.

Eiten, first I would like to say, your not a bad roleplayer. Whats wrong is that you are trying to roleplay beyond your level, way beyond your level. You also seem to have some sort of ADD, because you have a new idea every single damn day. You talk as if everyone has to cater to your needs. If someones does not want to roleplay with you...too bad, deal with it. You can not take Forest just because you want it and what is your argurement? ZE is taking BO so I can take Forest. No, you can present your case to the RP Team and they will make a judgement.

Kefkin, where the hell are you half the time? You make thing huge posts on the forums and the dissapear for a month. I have a 2nd account in your kingdom, you have a few decent ideas but your barely ever on. Your inactivity is my criticism against you. Also, stop letting the above mentioned talk for you.

Brad, I love you =D Deal with Sam not speaking english great, its good
enough to understand. I don't know enough about your rod to pass judgement on it so I'll leave it at that.

I hope I've said a few wise things, at least I could vent a little anger for this stupid speeding ticket I just got =D

StrykerTFFD · #2 07-03-2005, 02:18 AM

We have to check our egos but you don't? Aw.

But I agree, so booger.

Draenin · #3 07-03-2005, 02:18 AM

Well put.

Debaglio · #4 07-03-2005, 02:23 AM

Hmmm I proposed a takeover of forest with Becan six moths ago. I got an RP together to exlpore forest NOT attack it... posted a week previous...my thread was moved... then yesterday when I executed it (10+ men) I was pilloried, and told I could be there.

Im sorry I am the most active person on GK.

I go over to BO, and there's Zurk and gang... inside the castle... hmmm???

I have old items from my attempt to take it.

ADD is incorect, that does not exist. The correct term is ADHD.

Zurkiba · #5 07-03-2005, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

This war on Bel'la Olplyn. I'm for it, hell I even support it, I like to see the activity this has spawned. But for godsakes could we please be a little more civilized? I log on to see the Zormite Republic declaring victory with no BO members on. I understand that the RP team OK'ed the war, I understand that the time has been there, but you can't have a war without him on. He doesn't have to agree to the war, but he has to have the right to defend himself.

Victory was never declared... the entire event is on pause until the RP Team makes a decision.

And the RP Team's very first decision was to have the invasion without him on or not. They OKed the invasion to take place without him on. All he had to do was contact me and the date and time would've been changed. Instead he just sat there without saying a word as I told him the event and whatnot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

ADD is incorect, that does not exist. The correct term is ADHD.

There you go again, saying stuff doesn't exist.

Damix2 · #6 07-03-2005, 02:26 AM

ADD and ADHD are 2 different disorders.

Debaglio · #7 07-03-2005, 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

ADD and ADHD are 2 different disorders.

Not anymore... the APA, has declared that ADD is a mispronuciation, and they do not really correct the geral public. Believe me, speak about with it proper term you only look foolish using the latter.

Damix2 · #8 07-03-2005, 02:37 AM

Fine, if you can not look over a single detail, you are not fit to rule any kingdom.

Debaglio · #9 07-03-2005, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

Fine, if you can not look over a single detail, you are not fit to rule any kingdom.

I think you have been gone for to long.... I do not rule a kingdom, let alone even belong to one. I travel the outcast road, and live in the shadows. I am only trying to bring you back down to earth.

ADHD or not.. that doesnt matter, yes I have a lot of ideas, I belong to four guilds, not to mention two other accounts one in Samurai, and one Cp. So that makes me pretty GD active..... plus I have taken the western part of forest, while its members were on Bel'la... so thats six things im multitasking.

So.. tainted admin.. side with the oldbies.... I just stick up for Kef here because he has more logic in his pinky than most of you combined. Thats why he doesnt post to the bickering... thats all it is... people slamming me... so why would he respond. Time to look at some different kingdoms, stop attacking the new guy.

StrykerTFFD · #10 07-03-2005, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

..... plus I have taken the western part of forest, while its members were on Bel'la... so thats six things im multitasking.

Note:While the members of Forest were on BO I was on Forest guarding it. You never came by, so you never took anything.

Saying something doesn't make it true, fool.

Draenin · #11 07-03-2005, 02:56 AM

Damix is not 'tainted.' You are stupid. And what Dam meant is that you want to rule a kingdom when you're not part of it, and you are unfit to do so.

At least the oldbies know what the hell they're talking about and don't use ellipsis (...) everywhere in their sentences. Learn to form a correctly-written sentence, and we'll start working on your RP Character development, Mr. Drow Who Pops Out of Nowhere.

Damix2 · #12 07-03-2005, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

I think you have been gone for to long.... I do not rule a kingdom, let alone even belong to one. I travel the outcast road, and live in the shadows. I am only trying to bring you back down to earth.

But you want Forest?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

So.. tainted admin.. side with the oldbies.... I just stick up for Kef here because he has more logic in his pinky than most of you combined. Thats why he doesnt post to the bickering... thats all it is... people slamming me... so why would he respond. Time to look at some different kingdoms, stop attacking the new guy.

A think your a bit confused, I'm no admin and I side with no one.

Zurkiba · #13 07-03-2005, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

I think you have been gone for to long.... I do not rule a kingdom, let alone even belong to one. I travel the outcast road, and live in the shadows. I am only trying to bring you back down to earth.

You're screaming 'I GET TO RULE FOREST' every other post. To do that you require leadership.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

ADHD or not.. that doesnt matter, yes I have a lot of ideas, I belong to four guilds, not to mention two other accounts one in Samurai, and one Cp. So that makes me pretty GD active..... plus I have taken the western part of forest, while its members were on Bel'la... so thats six things im multitasking.

It's not multitasking unless you're doing it all at one time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

So.. tainted admin.. side with the oldbies.... I just stick up for Kef here because he has more logic in his pinky than most of you combined. Thats why he doesnt post to the bickering... thats all it is... people slamming me... so why would he respond. Time to look at some different kingdoms, stop attacking the new guy.

Logic, like how a land god would come from hell itself to fight in water. Riight.

Brad · #14 07-03-2005, 03:06 AM

that demon has to be pretty pissed

Zero Hour · #15 07-03-2005, 04:22 AM

Y'know, I really like Graal Kingdoms... mind you... i-i-i-i-t's not that I don't like the kingdom's part... i-i-i-i-t's just that I want it to not be a live.... anymore.

Darlene159 · #16 07-03-2005, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

ADD is incorect, that does not exist. The correct term is ADHD.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

Not anymore... the APA, has declared that ADD is a mispronuciation, and they do not really correct the geral public. Believe me, speak about with it proper term you only look foolish using the latter.

ADD=Attention Deficit Disorder
ADHD=Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Both basically the same, it's just that one has hyperactivity also
ADD does exist, and it is not a mis-pronunciation

(sorry to post off-topic)

Damix2 · #17 07-03-2005, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

ADD=Attention Deficit Disorder
ADHD=Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Both basically the same, it's just that one has hyperactivity also
ADD does exist, and it is not a mis-pronunciation

(sorry to post off-topic)

Thats what I was thinking, but I didn't feel like arguing.

Debaglio · #18 07-03-2005, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

ADD=Attention Deficit Disorder
ADHD=Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Both basically the same, it's just that one has hyperactivity also
ADD does exist, and it is not a mis-pronunciation

(sorry to post off-topic)

Thats what they used to stand for... back in the day.... now we know more about the brain.

Damix... change your admin thing if your no admin.

Here you go;

The American Psychiatric Association's diagnostic manual, the DSM, lists 18 behaviors, from which a teacher can check off behaviors she observes in the potential patient or student. Likewise, the parent or caregiver does the same thing. In the current DSM, if one checks six or more of the nine, the individual is deemed to have ADHD.

APA... says look to the DSM (the manual) you will find no mention about ADD in DSM 4. DSM 5 is coming out soon.. and it also does not recognize the term ADD.

ONLY ADHD.

I post so you people can get the facts str8, when you gonna realize im not blowing smoke?

Draenin · #19 07-03-2005, 02:40 PM

It's hard to like GK in times like this, ZH.

Darlene159 · #20 07-03-2005, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debaglio

Thats what they used to stand for... back in the day.... now we know more about the brain.

Ok, to end the off-topic posting, I did some research as it has been several years since I have dealt with ADD/ADHD, and it appears that you are right in a sense. All they did was name it ADHD, ADD being like a sub catagory of ADHD so to speak:

Is there a difference between ADD & ADHD?
The main difference is one of terminology. ADD which stands for Attention Deficit Disorder, is used by many as a kind of generic term for all types of ADHD.

This term has gained popularity among the general public, and is also commonly used among professionals as well. ADD was the name given to ADHD in 1980 by the American Psychiatric Association, which later changed it to its current “official and clinical” term of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in 1994. This name change occurred as a result of scientific advances and careful clinical trials.

Researchers now support the position that ADHD is not a specific disorder with different variations.

It is divided into three subtypes, based upon the symptoms of inattentiveness/distractibility, impulsivity, and hyperactivity:
- Combined Type,
- Predominantly Inattentive Type, (ADD)
- Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Type (ADHD)

So in the end, whether it is called ADD or ADHD it is basically referring to the same thing.

So, you were right, I was wrong (the "go to college" bit was uncalled for though...no need to be a jerk about it....
<End off-topic posting>