Fujiwara

[damrog]

Takumi and I have decided to start our own family (or samurai clan within samurai itself) and we were just wondering if we can do this with the blessing of the Shogun and Empress? the Family/Clan would the Fujiwara.

[damrog]

p.s. this would not have a seperate guild tag or anything ... it would just be a last name

[damrog]

I also have a story line, rules etc, this is specifically meant for Shogun Bosh if he wish to see these

[AlexH]

Send the guy a PM.
Easier to get a response that way.

[XGoLink]

You could've edited those 2messages, anyway, I like the idea..
Would be good if the family stays in one section of ranks.

[damrog]

Soon i will put up the details involved with the Clan, the main problem with keeping it in one rank is that i only wish to be in the citizenship until i get to the required rank to be ashigaru. i.e. i wish to join the warrior ranks of our great kingdom. Good samurai clans fight for their Kingdom and its rulers at least that is what bushido instills in its samurai followers

[Zurkiba]

Originally Posted by damrog

Soon i will put up the details involved with the Clan, the main problem with keeping it in one rank is that i only wish to be in the citizenship until i get to the required rank to be ashigaru. i.e. i wish to join the warrior ranks of our great kingdom. Good samurai clans fight for their Kingdom and its rulers at least that is what bushido instills in its samurai followers

Good Samurai fight for money and land. Japanese historian you are not.

[damrog]

have u studied the way of bushido? what makes u such an authority on the subject?

[Zurkiba]

Originally Posted by damrog

have u studied the way of bushido? what makes u such an authority on the subject?

The Bushido Code puts state and Emperor above all else, yes. However, Samurai fought for jade and land.

And I'm not claiming to be an authority on the subject, I'm merely pointing out historic facts.

[damrog]

i do not wish to go into historic facts as i am sure that i could find more evidence to the contrary however i digress as i dont see the relevence of your previous statement to the purpose of this thread all it is, is nitpicking and undermining, no offence intended i just wish to stay on point

[Zurkiba]

Originally Posted by damrog

i do not wish to go into historic facts as i am sure that i could find more evidence to the contrary however i digress as i dont see the relevence of your previous statement to the purpose of this thread all it is, is nitpicking and undermining, no offence intended i just wish to stay on point

You asked a question, therefore I answered it.

However, I'll let you go on with your thread - I was merely correcting a historic flaw in your post.

[damrog]

thank you very much i was not aiming at historic accuracy in any case