Your age!

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by -Ching

Well we can never be sure, this is the internet afterall

Correct.

Originally Posted by Gerami

How do we know?

You don't.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You don't.

I know, I was going back to when you said that people can lie about their ages and how you can't be sure of stuff on the net.

For all I know you could be unixmad hiding.

[excaliber7388]

But Graal already bases something on the user's wprd.
When you get an account, you have to verify your age. Now, if the user's word is good enough then, then it should be good enough now. If a person wanted to change the results, they would have gone for the 25+. Lets face it, most people here are older than 18, and graal should recognize that
If you want to see a copy of my drivers licence, I could send it to you

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Gerami

For all I know you could be unixmad hiding.

No, that's impossible.

Originally Posted by excaliber7388

But Graal already bases something on the user's wprd.
When you get an account, you have to verify your age. Now, if the user's word is good enough then, then it should be good enough now. If a person wanted to change the results, they would have gone for the 25+. Lets face it, most people here are older than 18, and graal should recognize that
If you want to see a copy of my drivers licence, I could send it to you

But it doesn't matter at all how old users posting on this forum are.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Sam

No, that's impossible.

How so?

But it doesn't matter at all how old users posting on this forum are.

1) It does matter, which is why the lounge was apparently created...

2) You post using your Graal account which had to agree to that age thing to begin with, right?

3) Some of us are honest.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Gerami

How so?

There are proofs like IP's for example.

Originally Posted by Gerami

1) It does matter, which is why the lounge was apparently created...
2) You post using your Graal account which had to agree to that age thing to begin with, right?
3) Some of us are honest.

Yes, but our forum rules are made not only because of the age of the users. It's also made to beware a immaculate appearance of GraalOnline and Cyberjoueurs.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Sam

There are proofs like IP's for example.

Could be spoofed, could be someone else logging in to make sure the ips change, etc.

It's also made to beware a immaculate appearance of GraalOnline and Cyberjoueurs.

I'm stupid, explain these terms.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Gerami

I'm stupid, explain these terms.

Can't agree, you just a little oblivious:
check this

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Sam

Can't agree, you just a little oblivious:
check this

Let me put this in RC terms.

/find point
Gerami prob: file point not found

I'll just shut up since I don't get it.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Gerami

Let me put this in RC terms.

/find point
Gerami prob: file point not found

I'll just shut up since I don't get it.

Plain and simple said: The company don't want themes discussed which are not suitable for children under 14 years. And the company gave us more or less precise directions by the rules.

[Mykel]

Originally Posted by Sam

Plain and simple said: The company don't want themes discussed which are not suitable for children under 14 years. And the company gave us more or less precise directions by the rules.

Understandable. However, what do posts about religion, abortion, and many other moral issues have to do with age? How are they not suitable for someone of the age of 14? If someone says something that isn't suitable, delete that post, that is your job as a mod. Instead, threads are always locked.

Using age as a justification for your increased rules would make sense if age actually played a role in most cases. Also, as I said before, how many complaints did you get a few years ago that suggested that rule changes were needed?

[excaliber7388]

Originally Posted by Sam

Plain and simple said: The company don't want themes discussed which are not suitable for children under 14 years. And the company gave us more or less precise directions by the rules.

So make an 18+ Lounge, because most forums goers are 18+

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Mykel

Understandable. However, what do posts about religion, abortion, and many other moral issues have to do with age? How are they not suitable for someone of the age of 14? If someone says something that isn't suitable, delete that post, that is your job as a mod. Instead, threads are always locked.

Using age as a justification for your increased rules would make sense if age actually played a role in most cases. Also, as I said before, how many complaints did you get a few years ago that suggested that rule changes were needed?

This is what Unixmad said:

Originally Posted by Unixmad

• The official forums are focused on Graalonline, our goal is not to provide a general forum to discuss about television or cinema but Graal. Even if it's not our goal to provide such discussion, we have allowed a non graal related forum and a private forum with relaxed rules...

Themes like religion are highly sensitive so its not a theme we should discuss here. This has nothing to do with age but with social issues.

[excaliber7388]

Originally Posted by Sam

This is what Unixmad said:



Themes like religion are highly sensitive so its not a theme we should discuss here. This has nothing to do with age but with social issues.

Only one rule was relaxed, the hyperlink rule

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Sam

Plain and simple said: The company don't want themes discussed which are not suitable for children under 14 years. And the company gave us more or less precise directions by the rules.

But you just said age doesn't matter.