Zero owned Gscript!!!

zokemon · #1 05-18-2004, 05:04 AM

Wow...
Did anyone else ever do this? (Not using useless crap but an actual script that works)

Quote:

Script of weapon Player/Staff Tool added/updated.
Warning: Script limit exceeded (29055 > 28671 bytes)
Zero: wtf
Zero: you are s***ing me!
*Sky: rofl
Jakk: Oh
Jakk: My
Jakk: God
Jakk: SOMEONE SCRIPTED TO MUCH
Jakk: GREATEST DAY EVER
Zero: this sucks ***
Jakk: I know
Jakk: but
Jakk: You
Jakk: Owned gscript...

[EDIT]

Quote:

IllIllziroIllIll: rofl
IllIllziroIllIll: someone will probably flame you now
IllIllziroIllIll: saying you're stupid
IllIllziroIllIll: and they've done it
IllIllziroIllIll: while 95% of the people start using what you learned to play around and have fun with their servers

2 words: Bring it.

(If you count the

as a word then it is 3 words)
[/EDIT]

DIABLO2099 · #2 05-18-2004, 05:09 AM

I think Googi exceeded the character limit before or something like that, don't think it's too healthy for a script to be so lengthy unless...o_O.

zokemon · #3 05-18-2004, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DIABLO2099

I think Googi exceeded the character limit before or something like that, don't think it's too healthy for a script to be so lengthy unless...o_O.

The script is in functions and they are only called if you have certian strings...
I know how to do it and it don't lag so don't worry ;P

EsCanavi · #4 05-18-2004, 05:40 AM

Lol That used to hapend to me alot time =P

MysticalDragonP2P · #5 05-18-2004, 07:08 AM

Happened to me after a year of editing the same script hahaha

zokemon · #6 05-18-2004, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticalDragonP2P

Happened to me after a year of editing the same script hahaha

lmao!
This was only like a month at most of scripting this?

Dach · #7 05-19-2004, 08:31 PM

its happened before, Tyhm even suggested the limit be raised, not sure if it was though... or did he just suggest the amount of weapons carryable by players?? either way

Lance · #8 05-20-2004, 02:21 AM

Few weapons should need to be bigger than this. If your weapon is not very complicated (my definition, not yours), it is quite probably inefficient.

Dach · #9 05-20-2004, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Few weapons should need to be bigger than this. If your weapon is not very complicated (my definition, not yours), it is quite probably inefficient.

tis a staff tool, so chances are it is the swiss army knife of pockets' nightmares

Alexander · #10 05-20-2004, 06:37 AM

I never ever hit that size problem, most of my scripts are short and complicated :x

Crono · #11 05-20-2004, 02:59 PM

That script probably comes with a portable microwave and a year's supply of ban hammers.

Polo · #12 05-20-2004, 06:46 PM

Never had a script that long.. not one for npc server anyway. What you should do is optimize out everything, perhaps moving derverside function calls (using triggeraction) to a seperate weapon if needed.

zokemon · #13 05-20-2004, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Few weapons should need to be bigger than this. If your weapon is not very complicated (my definition, not yours), it is quite probably inefficient.

It is actually extremly efficient as I make sure my scripts are very orginized and work well...
The reason it is so long is because of the user-friendly GUI that I made for it and all the features it has like being able to set people's staff tool rights (Not RC rights) from the player. If you see it you would understand. I have shown this staff tool to a lot of people and everyone says it is the best one they have ever seen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dach

tis a staff tool, so chances are it is the swiss army knife of pockets' nightmares

Wrong. There is absoluly nothing in this tool that can harm a player in anyway short of being able to jail. My main perpose in making it was for it to NOT be abused.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polo

Never had a script that long.. not one for npc server anyway. What you should do is optimize out everything, perhaps moving derverside function calls (using triggeraction) to a seperate weapon if needed.

What I did was a very simple solution: Just put the script into a class and have the NPCW only have 1 line of script in it:

NPC Code:
join stafftool;

Works just fine

I didn't post this for questions or complaint or anything but rather to see who else has ever come across this. And of course to point out my solution.

Dach · #14 05-20-2004, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

Wrong. There is absoluly nothing in this tool that can harm a player in anyway short of being able to jail. My main perpose in making it was for it to NOT be abused.

that is soo incredibly not what I meant... I meant it probably has tons of tools/toys/whathaveya in it

I was proud of that phrase too

Quote:

What I did was a very simple solution: Just put the script into a class and have the NPCW only have 1 line of script in it:

[John Elway commercial]I'd of broken it into parts[/John Elway commercial] <- not trying to compete, just saying what I'd do o.O wait, you can have a weapon join a class? well, that's not that strange, ohwell

Lance · #15 05-20-2004, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

It is actually extremly efficient as I make sure my scripts are very orginized and work well...

You'll excuse my natural doubt as to that statement's accuracy, then. You'll also reread my statement and refer to the "unnecessarily complicated or inefficient" clause.

Quote:

The reason it is so long is because of the user-friendly GUI that I made for it and all the features it has like being able to set people's staff tool rights (Not RC rights) from the player.

TMTOWTDI.

Quote:

If you see it you would understand. I have shown this staff tool to a lot of people and everyone says it is the best one they have ever seen.

So what if Tom and Fred think your script is the best in the world? Simple things impress people who can't script. You're missing my point. 28K is more than enough room for the vast majority of scripts. Those that take up more than this could quite probably be improved, optimized, or edited somehow. You also don't seem to grasp the concept of efficiency. Efficiency is neither measured by how organized your code is nor by the result of the script. It measures how well your code runs.

Sigh.

Polo · #16 05-21-2004, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

What I did was a very simple solution: Just put the script into a class and have the NPCW only have 1 line of script in it:

NPC Code:
join stafftool;

I was unsure if there was a similar length limit on classes.

zokemon · #17 05-21-2004, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dach

that is soo incredibly not what I meant... I meant it probably has tons of tools/toys/whathaveya in it

Nope no toys with MAYBE the exception of the staff block which is only intended to block people from levels and such with out having to edit the level it self. (Or to do other UC things like such)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polo

I was unsure if there was a similar length limit on classes.

The limit is just the limit for file uploads (I think?)

Googi · #18 05-29-2004, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DIABLO2099

I think Googi exceeded the character limit before or something like that

Yes, while trying to make bomy battling, I exceeded the script character limit.

Deek2 · #19 05-31-2004, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Few weapons should need to be bigger than this. If your weapon is not very complicated (my definition, not yours), it is quite probably inefficient.

Looks like GScript owned you.

zokemon · #20 05-31-2004, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deek2

Looks like GScript owned you.

Not really since I ended up getting around it with in 5 seconds.

Kappa00p2p · #21 06-01-2004, 12:54 AM

osnap .

Deek2 · #22 06-01-2004, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

Not really since I ended up getting around it with in 5 seconds.

It doesn't even really make sense. You didn't own GScript. It was just merely giving you advice that your script is too long and you need to cut it down a bit. And somehow, you misinterpreted that. Or you probably did, and just made this thread for absolutely no reason.

zokemon · #23 06-01-2004, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deek2

It doesn't even really make sense. You didn't own GScript. It was just merely giving you advice that your script is too long and you need to cut it down a bit. And somehow, you misinterpreted that. Or you probably did, and just made this thread for absolutely no reason.

Are you stupid?
If you read the conversation, I was not the one who originaly said that "I owned GScript". In addition, I posted this to see who else had encountered this and to provide a usefull solution to get around it.

Deek2 · #24 06-01-2004, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

Are you stupid?
If you read the conversation, I was not the one who originaly said that "I owned GScript". In addition, I posted this to see who else had encountered this and to provide a usefull solution to get around it.

Alas, you missed my point. It's still pointless to use it in that context, for the reason that it's very incorrect. Plus the fact that calling me "stupid" isn't really proving anything, and is a waste on your side. It's like calling someone a retard because they made a typo.

Oh, and by the way, you were the one that made the thread title "Zero owned GScript!!!(and more unecessary !s)". So, therefore, you were the one that said it. Am I not wrong?

Dach · #25 06-01-2004, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

and to provide a usefull solution to get around it.

I like mine better

note: you still missed my point, but I don't care and I'd rather this thread die

zokemon · #26 06-02-2004, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deek2

Alas, you missed my point. It's still pointless to use it in that context, for the reason that it's very incorrect. Plus the fact that calling me "stupid" isn't really proving anything, and is a waste on your side. It's like calling someone a retard because they made a typo.

Oh, and by the way, you were the one that made the thread title "Zero owned GScript!!!(and more unecessary !s)". So, therefore, you were the one that said it. Am I not wrong?

Then I apologize (sp?) for saying that.

CaTigus · #27 06-04-2004, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zokemon

Wow...
Did anyone else ever do this? (Not using useless crap but an actual script that works)

[EDIT]

2 words: Bring it.

(If you count the

as a word then it is 3 words)
[/EDIT]

I have done that many times, Nothing special.