A bit out of my style

protagonist · #1 08-27-2003, 02:48 AM

I tried doing a level in the style that seems to get the happy faces. I hope you guys like it. (NOTE: The purpose of the dark spot is shown in the second attachment)

[EDIT]Ok, there was apparently no need for a second attachment.[/EDIT]

Judge_S · #2 08-27-2003, 02:51 AM

It's sparsely detailed...

protagonist · #3 08-27-2003, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Judge_S
It's sparsely detailed...

I know that. It's completely different than what I usually do, but people keep saying that my detailing is awful. I might as well start from scratch I guess.

Thought · #4 08-27-2003, 03:13 AM

Decent, shadows on house need reworking, though. Detailing is fine, but i'm an oldbie, what do I know?

Azrael528 · #5 08-27-2003, 07:14 AM

more detail would be nice....tip: use some elevated grass and dirt tiles. and then look around the tileset for other ground tiles you think look good

ETD · #6 08-27-2003, 09:01 AM

OMG, am I the only one who actually took this as a joke?

i'll rate it anyways, 1/10

lol, i'd piss on that level too :P

SingleChance · #7 08-27-2003, 09:19 AM

i also thought it was a joke at first...

protagonist · #8 08-27-2003, 04:21 PM

Like I said, this isn't my style. I figured I'd try it anyway.

Nick1988 · #9 08-27-2003, 11:12 PM

I don't like it. Not many features or detail. 2/10, that style isn't very good, but nice try, I guess.

Dude6252000 · #10 08-28-2003, 12:46 AM

Your level is ****!!11

That was tempting.

But seriously, it's not that good. 3/10

protagonist · #11 08-28-2003, 01:48 AM

Ok *goes back to old way*.

I've just been seeing some pretty crappy levels get 8/10 for no apparent reason, and they had less detail than that.

Nick1988 · #12 08-28-2003, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
Ok *goes back to old way*.

I've just been seeing some pretty crappy levels get 8/10 for no apparent reason, and they had less detail than that.

When?

Blitz_Hunter · #13 08-28-2003, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
I tried doing a level in the style that seems to get the happy faces.

XD Im pretty sure that doesnt get happy faces

NeoJenova · #14 08-28-2003, 11:16 AM

Wow, you need a lot of detail and... this was a joke right?

1/10

I don't think I would even enjoy walking in that level.

Keep trying...

protagonist · #15 08-28-2003, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NeoJenova
Wow, you need a lot of detail and... this was a joke right?

1/10

I don't think I would even enjoy walking in that level.

Keep trying...

Kind of like how you do you're job, hm? Just because I don't like you I'll throw in a level from a little while ago.

Nick1988 · #16 08-28-2003, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

Kind of like how you do you're job, hm? Just because I don't like you I'll throw in a level from a little while ago.

Sorry to say, but that level is much better than the one you posted.(My opinion, don't freak out)

Dude6252000 · #17 08-29-2003, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nick1988
Sorry to say, but that level is much better than the one you posted.(My opinion, don't freak out)

I find it cluttered and..Er.. Why is there water on that path generated path? And where's the shore*?;o

Nick1988 · #18 08-29-2003, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dude6252000

I find it cluttered and..Er.. Why is there water on that path generated path? And where's the shore*?;o

The path isn't very good, I still think it looks better than his level.

Eric_1337 · #19 08-29-2003, 01:35 AM

lol, I think both of them as jokes. :o

the first one was a poorly made house and grass and trees. The second one was grass thingy's, generated trailing, and a cave and trees. =-o! la la la funny.

I'd suggest trashing you "style" and learn from someone who knows how to make levels.

protagonist · #20 08-29-2003, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Eric_1337
lol, I think both of them as jokes. :o

I'd suggest trashing you "style" and learn from someone who knows how to make levels.

Well, that excludes you then.

Quote:

Sorry to say, but that level is much better than the one you posted.(My opinion, don't freak out)

I didn't think it was great either, I just wanted to see what the responses would be.

P.S:For the record, I do not use the level generator for anything.

TB3 · #21 08-29-2003, 08:44 AM

I dont usualy rate things but so im not giving it a number im just giving it the "Average level" reward because it is a low detail average level

(And off subject if we werent so used to seeing the same graal tileset over and over and over a level like this might seem pretty nice to walk in if it were in a new tileset because the surroundings wouldnt have been something you had seen 12 thousand times )

*note this is just my opinion i dont want to even spark a reply*

Eric_1337 · #22 08-29-2003, 09:35 PM

I'll reply anyway,

if that were the case, which it most definatly wassn't, there really wouldn't be a need for a levels section, it'd be considered the graphics section -.-, because it'd just be based on how the tileset looks. Thats like saying "If I were blind it'd look better".

TB3 · #23 08-30-2003, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Eric_1337
I'll reply anyway,

if that were the case, which it most definatly wassn't, there really wouldn't be a need for a levels section, it'd be considered the graphics section -.-, because it'd just be based on how the tileset looks. Thats like saying "If I were blind it'd look better".

That is stretching it a little if you were blind you wouldn't know what you were looking at anyways

Eric_1337 · #24 08-30-2003, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TB3

That is stretching it a little if you were blind you wouldn't know what you were looking at anyways

Yeah I couldn't think of any other example at that time lol.