Stupid question - Page 2

MadWolf · #41 07-20-2003, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Your sig is now far too big. The height limit is 300 pixels.

It's smaller than Golbez's. If the limit is 300, then a signature image mod/hack should be put in place. www.vbulletin.org would have it mostly likely.

edit: it is not more than 300 pixels, right click the image and go to properties.

Kaimetsu · #42 07-20-2003, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf
it is not more than 300 pixels

Stop being stupid.

MadWolf · #43 07-20-2003, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Stop being stupid.

539 Pixels in width.

Kaimetsu · #44 07-20-2003, 09:11 AM

The height limit is 300 pixels.

MadWolf · #45 07-20-2003, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu
The height limit is 300 pixels.

Perhaps next time specify that. I assume it used the basics of the avatar, having same width and height limites.

Kaimetsu · #46 07-20-2003, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf

Perhaps next time specify that. I assume it used the basics of the avatar, having same width and height limites.

Why on earth would we make a 300 pixel width limit? This isn't rocket science, dude.

MadWolf · #47 07-20-2003, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Why on earth would we make a 300 pixel width limit? This isn't rocket science, dude.

Why on earth? I know some forums that dont even allowe signatures due to the fact some people cant control their urge to make stupid signatures. And what is, in fact, the width limit on a sig? As I see nothing to inform us of this. (Check FAQ pages)

DevilsDice · #48 07-20-2003, 09:33 AM

Wow... Am I causing trouble?

Also, I dont think it's fair to 'limit' my sig length. All i'm doing is showing i like something... If I HAVE to, I wil change it, otherwise...

:o

MadWolf · #49 07-20-2003, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DevilsDice
Wow... Am I causing trouble?

Also, I dont think it's fair to 'limit' my sig length. All i'm doing is showing i like something... If I HAVE to, I wil change it, otherwise...

:o

Welcome to Graal, any form of Democracy is prohibited. Hail comrade.

Kaimetsu · #50 07-20-2003, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DevilsDice
Wow... Am I causing trouble?

Also, I dont think it's fair to 'limit' my sig length.

But it's fair to inconvenience other users with your stupidly-big signature? We don't want to have to scroll through pages of sigs just to read the posts.

Quote:

If I HAVE to, I wil change it

Good, because you do.

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf
Why on earth?

Yes, that's what I asked you.

Quote:

And what is, in fact, the width limit on a sig? As I see nothing to inform us of this. (Check FAQ pages)

There hasn't been the need to formally define one. If we did, I imagine that it would be somewhere around 600 pixels.

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf
Welcome to Graal, any form of Democracy is prohibited. Hail comrade.

I thought I asked you to stop being stupid.

1) Having freedom to choose any type of sig is not in any way connected to democracy.
2) We're not suppressing self-expression by limiting the size. We're just making the board more convenient for other users.

Tseng · #51 07-20-2003, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf

Why on earth? I know some forums that dont even allowe signatures due to the fact some people cant control their urge to make stupid signatures. And what is, in fact, the width limit on a sig? As I see nothing to inform us of this. (Check FAQ pages)

Signature width has little to do with how much you have to scroll up/down to read the next post's text.

MadWolf · #52 07-20-2003, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tseng

Signature width has little to do with how much you have to scroll up/down to read the next post's text.

I did not know it was a matter of laziness in scrolling down.

Tseng · #53 07-20-2003, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf

I did not know it was a matter of laziness in scrolling down.

Do you have trouble reading? Kaimetsu clearly stated that it's an issue of inconveniencing other users by forcing them to scroll through all of the large signature images.

MadWolf · #54 07-20-2003, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tseng

Do you have trouble reading? Kaimetsu clearly stated that it's an issue of inconveniencing other users by forcing them to scroll through all of the large signature images.

I must have trouble reading, or the fact I dont quite consider it a "inconvenience" to scroll down. Whatever, I suppose I'm just messing around. :o

brock128 · #55 07-20-2003, 04:56 PM

Hail, comrads!

Yes, the signature thing has some merit, but why can't you talk about MMORPGS? Especially ones like PSO and Diablo 2 (hint those aren't mmorpgs)

Democracy? What's that?

Kaimetsu · #56 07-20-2003, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf
I must have trouble reading, or the fact I dont quite consider it a "inconvenience" to scroll down. Whatever, I suppose I'm just messing around. :o

No, you're just being foolish. Would you not complain if a signature extended to a height of a million pixels? You might be more tolerant than most of this egocentric practice, but everybody has their limits.

Golbez · #57 07-20-2003, 08:09 PM

Well.. I was going to remove my second one anyways... It was a joke.. I got kicked off when I set it. Its removed now o.o

DevilsDice · #58 07-21-2003, 07:01 AM

Wow... ya know, I love it when people get into fights over foolish things... but until I get a notice saying that my sig's are too big. Until then, I spose your gonna have to click on more time on that gap between the arrows... LOL

Funny