Graalian Awards - Playerworld of the Year!

Mykel · #1 07-19-2003, 06:04 AM

If you don't know what this is about read the Graalian Awards thread in the Main forum. But this is to vote for the PW of the year!

This vote should be based on what server you think has made the greatest strides.

MadWolf · #2 07-19-2003, 06:53 AM

Era, even though I hate it. It has brought something new to the community and has been VERY successful.

tlf288 · #3 07-19-2003, 06:57 AM

Era, same reason as Scott.

HoudiniMan · #4 07-19-2003, 09:19 AM

Kingdoms

MadWolf · #5 07-19-2003, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HoudiniMan
Kingdoms

Playerworld.

Minoc · #6 07-19-2003, 12:30 PM

Graal2001 isn't exactly a playeworld \=

protagonist · #7 07-19-2003, 01:13 PM

UN, it's almost always on top.

superb · #8 07-19-2003, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
UN, it's almost always on top.

That doesn't mean it is good.

protagonist · #9 07-19-2003, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by superb

That doesn't mean it is good.

Ok, ask our 200+ daily playercount if it's good.

superb · #10 07-19-2003, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

Ok, ask our 200+ daily playercount if it's good.

The point is that whether its good or not is entirely subjective.

protagonist · #11 07-19-2003, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by superb

The point is that whether its good or not is entirely subjective.

Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

Zurkiba · #12 07-19-2003, 03:56 PM

Graal 2230

Androk · #13 07-19-2003, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

They play UN because alot of people play UN, so it's not really quality, more of a quantity =P

Dude6252000 · #14 07-19-2003, 06:10 PM

Graal2001 is a playerworld now, because it's controlled by playerworlds. So no one else should be saying that. :x

HoudiniMan · #15 07-19-2003, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf

Playerworld.

Kingdoms is the most fun and has made the most progress... I still vote for it.

DragonX · #16 07-19-2003, 09:03 PM

Unholy Nation. I played it long ago when it was new and I liked it. It has evolved so much and that's why it has the most players on it. The events are fun and I like it

MarkB · #17 07-19-2003, 09:19 PM

era, even though i cannot stand angel, when she had an idea for gun style server, everyone laughed. she did it, good job.

Golbez · #18 07-19-2003, 09:36 PM

Umm... the year is like 3/4th over whats the use of having awards now?

Golbez · #19 07-19-2003, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tlf288

Because Mykel isn't very bright and likes to spam :grin: .

I say someone better get out the ban hammer on him

Mykel · #20 07-19-2003, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Golbez

I say someone better get out the ban hammer on him

Thats not going to happen.

I already confirmed this with Kai anyway. Read my post (origional one) in the graal forums bout these.

Golbez · #21 07-19-2003, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mykel
Thats not going to happen.
I already confirmed this with Kai anyway. Read my post (origional one) in the graal forums bout these.

Ahh I see lol, sorry and I was joking lol. When ever I wink im joking

Thallen · #22 07-20-2003, 12:00 AM

Even though this is the playerworld I hate the most...I voted for Era. Era has brought a completely new style to Graal, as well as some new members, most likely. It has a nice tileset and great scripting, as well as a great manager.

Soul-Blade · #23 07-20-2003, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

When I log onto a new game, I say "Hmm...that world has the most players, so I better play it". That is what newbies do. Out of all the playerworlds online, Graal2001 destroys them as far as quality and amount to do. As far as the "best" playerworld with originality, that is public, Era destroys all. All UN can say is it has a good playercount, because newbies go to un because it has the highest playercount. It will not go lower because of the fact people have made friends there, and contact friends there.

Quality and popularity are 2 very different stories. Just like how SOM is way more known then Terranigma. Terranigma beats SOM's story by a landslide, its graphics are better, and the battle is equal to, I'd say better because of the variety of different moves. SOM has Terranigma beat only on the magic system...still, SOM was much more popular...in this case probably because the company had a better name, and was known for the best in RPG games.

That comparisn is in a whole different league, because both Terranigma and SOM are amazing. UN is nothing more then gutter trash, Era was nice and very original, and Graal2001 is the best classic world there is. I use the term classic to describe worls using the old tileset, and theme.

Eric_1337 · #24 07-20-2003, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul-Blade

When I log onto a new game, I say "Hmm...that world has the most players, so I better play it". That is what newbies do. Out of all the playerworlds online, Graal2001 destroys them as far as quality and amount to do. As far as the "best" playerworld with originality, that is public, Era destroys all. All UN can say is it has a good playercount, because newbies go to un because it has the highest playercount. It will not go lower because of the fact people have made friends there, and contact friends there.

Quality and popularity are 2 very different stories. Just like how SOM is way more known then Terranigma. Terranigma beats SOM's story by a landslide, its graphics are better, and the battle is equal to, I'd say better because of the variety of different moves. SOM has Terranigma beat only on the magic system...still, SOM was much more popular...in this case probably because the company had a better name, and was known for the best in RPG games.

That comparisn is in a whole different league, because both Terranigma and SOM are amazing. UN is nothing more then gutter trash, Era was nice and very original, and Graal2001 is the best classic world there is. I use the term classic to describe worls using the old tileset, and theme.

Eh, your theory is incomplete, whatever happened to Graal Classic? Wasn't it always the best until something changed that... something had to have grabbed the players eyes and drawn them to it... it's called UnholyNation. Although UN doesn't have the best levels for the most part, the over-all scale of what goes on there is unbearable. There is a lot to do on UN other then "talk to friends". Someone who doesn't play UN would say what you have just utterd(sp?).

Graal Classic was always on top, I'm sure people made friends there and got thier stats up and had fun and all that, why did it lose players then? What's so different from UN to Classic?

It's everything that UN has to offer. UN has some of the best pking and sparring spots in all of graal. Their events are the most uniqely configured and most fun-filled events I will ever play. They also have the fact of questing and then all of their systems that deal with money were one of a kind.

Don't just say that all the ****ies go there because it's on the top of the list, there is obviously more to it.

TifaKhan · #25 07-20-2003, 09:12 AM

meh
Era: great place to be sexually harrassed
UN : great place to lag
Guess i know what i would vote

Soul-Blade · #26 07-20-2003, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Eric_1337

Eh, your theory is incomplete, whatever happened to Graal Classic? Wasn't it always the best until something changed that... something had to have grabbed the players eyes and drawn them to it... it's called UnholyNation. Although UN doesn't have the best levels for the most part, the over-all scale of what goes on there is unbearable. There is a lot to do on UN other then "talk to friends". Someone who doesn't play UN would say what you have just utterd(sp?).

Graal Classic was always on top, I'm sure people made friends there and got thier stats up and had fun and all that, why did it lose players then? What's so different from UN to Classic?

It's everything that UN has to offer. UN has some of the best pking and sparring spots in all of graal. Their events are the most uniqely configured and most fun-filled events I will ever play. They also have the fact of questing and then all of their systems that deal with money were one of a kind.

Don't just say that all the ****ies go there because it's on the top of the list, there is obviously more to it.

Read the damn comparisn then open your smart mouth.

Classic was a crappy server as well, don't you understand that? People played it because it was already populated. I don't expect such a ignorant mind to understand what I am saying, so I won't bother to say any more.

Eric_1337 · #27 07-20-2003, 07:37 PM

then how did that server lose those players? I mean your theory stats:

top server, with top playercount, is ****... but still gets players because of friends and thats all, they will never LOSE that playercount because of the friends.

Well Classic lost their playercount, so your theory is wrong.

View Poll Results: And the Nominees are:
Unholy Nation	6	18.75%
Graal 2001	9	28.13%
Era	17	53.13%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll