PW Reviewers; read

[Zolrieg]

I couldn't decide where to place this thread, but I'm going to go ahead and post it here. I got the general ideal from a couple of gaming mags. anyways, maybe the PlayerWorld Reviewers should review playerworlds by judging different criterias? this way the server owners and administrators could easily see were they went wrong... (man, I want a PlayerWorld Reviewer job soo bad, my tummy hurts! ^_~)

Gameplay (0.5-5.0): was the server fun to play, did it offer fun and still consist of proffessionality? would the player be interested and find replay after they've completed the initial quests?

Concept (0.5-5.0): did the server contain new ideals and features that were new to Graal or did it have vast arrays of over-used NPCs and remakes of old ideals?

Innovation (0.5-5.0): was the server innovative and did it captivate you? would the server draw players together or just consist of multiple one-player quests? I'm not talk about events either, people. ^_^

Design (0.5-5.0): how well was the server structured together or did it just seem rushed and unorganized? where the levels creative, did they go that extra mile to impress the player?

Visualization (0.5-5.0): were the graphics, ganis, and other visuals interesting and appealing to you, or did you find stolen graphics, etc.

Overall (0.5-5.0): the server's overall grading according to you, based on the other factors.

[WHIPENIE4]

Sounds like a good layout.
But maybe make it worth more... Overall should count on all the things together so....
Make the Gameplay,Concept,Innovation,Design and Visualization out of 10 each (1 being worst 10 being best).
Tally all the "points" at the end out of 50 then multiply it by 2 to get a mark. If the pw is under a cetain amount like 70 or 80 (cause we want good pw's) then they get a fail if its above 70-80 then they pass.

Ex:
Pw: SuperGokuPw1593957
Gameplay - 5
Concept - 3
Innovation- 2
Design - 7
Visualization- 5
Overall: 22 x 2
44%
Status: Fail

Then for each part say why you graded them like that and how they can improve etc..

[TheFrozenFiend]

Originally posted by Zolrieg

(0.5-5.0)

Whats wrong with 0-0.4?

[Zolrieg]

Originally posted by TheFrozenFiend


Whats wrong with 0-0.4?

huh, I'm confused?

[Spark910]

Yeah cant meber who but new one not jinx i dont think but they did review it but didnt say ANY improvemnet and all said was imprvment will defenetly make it better but didnt say what! So there left in the blank.

[WHIPENIE4]

Yeah cant meber who but new one not jinx i dont think but they did review it but didnt say ANY improvemnet and all said was imprvment will defenetly make it better but didnt say what! So there left in the blank.

Can you please restate that in english?
Im not sure if i got it right but what your trying to say is the new member which you dont know if its Jinx made a review and didnt put how to improve the pw just said to improve it?

[Zolrieg]

oh, cool beans.

[Jinx]

Originally posted by WHIPENIE4



Can you please restate that in english?
Im not sure if i got it right but what your trying to say is the new member which you dont know if its Jinx made a review and didnt put how to improve the pw just said to improve it?

I said how to improve it(if that's what he's asking). He needs to find someone good at levels, or try and fix them up himself.

-Jinx

[konidias]

Originally posted by Zolrieg
I couldn't decide where to place this thread, but I'm going to go ahead and post it here. I got the general ideal from a couple of gaming mags. anyways, maybe the PlayerWorld Reviewers should review playerworlds by judging different criterias? this way the server owners and administrators could easily see were they went wrong... (man, I want a PlayerWorld Reviewer job soo bad, my tummy hurts! ^_~)

Gameplay (0.5-5.0): was the server fun to play, did it offer fun and still consist of proffessionality? would the player be interested and find replay after they've completed the initial quests?

Concept (0.5-5.0): did the server contain new ideals and features that were new to Graal or did it have vast arrays of over-used NPCs and remakes of old ideals?

Innovation (0.5-5.0): was the server innovative and did it captivate you? would the server draw players together or just consist of multiple one-player quests? I'm not talk about events either, people. ^_^

Design (0.5-5.0): how well was the server structured together or did it just seem rushed and unorganized? where the levels creative, did they go that extra mile to impress the player?

Visualization (0.5-5.0): were the graphics, ganis, and other visuals interesting and appealing to you, or did you find stolen graphics, etc.

Overall (0.5-5.0): the server's overall grading according to you, based on the other factors.

Hmm sounds good.. but why not base it like a school test?

Like each area can get a grade of 0-100, 100 being perfect, 90 being like a b, etc.

That way, you can tally the 5-6 different areas using an average, like:

Gameplay: 75
Concept: 80
Innovation: 63
Design: 78
Visualization: 90

Overall would be the average of those, and if you know basic mathematics, to get the average, you add the 5 numbers together, and divide by 5 (5 being the number of areas)

So all of those added together would be 386, divide that by 5, you get 77, so they would get a D meaning they failed. Or something of that nature.

[Zolrieg]

Originally posted by konidias



Hmm sounds good.. but why not base it like a school test?

Like each area can get a grade of 0-100, 100 being perfect, 90 being like a b, etc.

That way, you can tally the 5-6 different areas using an average, like:

Gameplay: 75
Concept: 80
Innovation: 63
Design: 78
Visualization: 90

Overall would be the average of those, and if you know basic mathematics, to get the average, you add the 5 numbers together, and divide by 5 (5 being the number of areas)

So all of those added together would be 386, divide that by 5, you get 77, so they would get a D meaning they failed. Or something of that nature.

uh huh, some guy already beat you to the punch though... *points to the post above*

[iniquitus]

Zolrieg - 201 (21.32 posts per day)

...

...

Do you actualy PLAY Graal, or do you just spend all day on the forums trying to get a staff job?

Urizen

[Zolrieg]

Originally posted by iniquitus
Zolrieg - 201 (21.32 posts per day)

...

...

Do you actualy PLAY Graal, or do you just spend all day on the forums trying to get a staff job?

Urizen

haha, I had 2000 something post on my Kasuagi account.^_^

I use to play G2k1 24/7, I had the most gralats (55k I think), visio1 bomy and some hats. then something happend to my phone line, lost my internet access, accounts got banned for CC fraud and I got a life. now things have changed and I'm back to devoting my life to Graal!

[iniquitus]

LOL figured as much

Urizen

[Saga2001]

Not bad, maybe even make it so after it all they multiply and add and voila! There is a nice score?

[Psyker]

We need a better system for reviewing.

I'll try to set one up soon, if I don't lose my internet access...

[Zolrieg]

Originally posted by Psyker
We need a better system for reviewing.

I'll try to set one up soon, if I don't lose my internet access...

why would you lose your internet access? that happen to me, it really sucks when it's so unexpected to. if you have AIM, I could help you with the new reviewing system.

[Psyker]

Originally posted by Zolrieg


why would you lose your internet access? that happen to me, it really sucks when it's so unexpected to. if you have AIM, I could help you with the new reviewing system.

$50 for a junky DSL connection isn't a good deal for me. ;\

[Zolrieg]

Originally posted by Psyker

$50 for a junky DSL connection isn't a good deal for me. ;\

I'd rather have that than a junky monitor and 56K connection any day.