Graal Bible should be Classic-enabled

cbk1994 · #1 01-30-2011, 03:09 AM

Any account which has upgraded in the past should be able to edit the Graal Bible. It is silly that I cannot improve scripting documentation because I'm not a Gold member.

Tigairius · #2 01-30-2011, 03:10 AM

I support this. A wiki is a collaborative community development tool and reference guide. Members who are not gold are just as much of the community as classic members.

DustyPorViva · #3 01-30-2011, 03:11 AM

Gotta pay to do their work

adam · #4 01-30-2011, 04:57 AM

If you can't join em, beat em. Use Skyld's wiki. linked in my sig, and under my name.

cbk1994 · #5 01-30-2011, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adam

If you can't join em, beat em. Use Skyld's wiki. linked in my sig, and under my name.

I don't like Skyld's wiki, not to mention I've already started many articles such as this one which I don't want to transfer over and convert the markup.

cyan3 · #6 01-30-2011, 05:38 AM

I also support this. The wiki has been lonely as of late.

adam · #7 01-30-2011, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I don't like Skyld's wiki, not to mention I've already started many articles such as this one which I don't want to transfer over and convert the markup.

Still, should be classic enabled. But for as long as were here, if you want to make changes and have me submit them in your place I can, or just get into the GDT for that reason only. Since they fixed it so GDT can edit the wiki whatever their subscription. :/ totally not the same though, I know.

He did it once for the GDT, It should be very easy to create a special guild for wiki editors, that way there's a small way to protect the wiki from random editing, but it would also be very easy to add anybody who wishes to it as an editor. It's a reasonable compromise.

Door · #8 01-30-2011, 07:58 AM

Yeah I have no idea why this hasn't been done already. Wikis are basically free advertising for a game, and for some people they are more entertaining than the game itself.

Soala · #9 01-30-2011, 12:47 PM

Don't you forget I made Stefan enable it for GDT members!
That was a real pain to change his mind and make him do it, so having him enable it for everyone...
I guess a system like on forums could work? Enable the wiki for all members that have been gold once or something.

PowerProNL · #10 01-30-2011, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dustyporviva

gotta pay to do their work

+1

cbk1994 · #11 02-19-2011, 07:54 PM

Bump because I haven't been able to post any of the news articles I'd have liked to in the past few days for Era.

Admins · #12 02-19-2011, 10:05 PM

We don't plan to enable the Wiki for non-gold players, there would be too many potentional hijack problems.

Fulg0reSama · #13 02-19-2011, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stefan

We don't plan to enable the Wiki for non-gold players, there would be too many potential hijack problems.

It says Classic Enabled, not Trial enabled.
Anyways, when you can figure where your logic falls apart let me know.

gwFCCtennis · #14 02-21-2011, 01:28 AM

Where do I sign up for the Bible, can't find the place to.

fowlplay4 · #15 02-21-2011, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gwFCCtennis

Where do I sign up for the Bible, can't find the place to.

Pretty sure you just use your Graal account.

gwFCCtennis · #16 02-21-2011, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Pretty sure you just use your Graal account.

You are a lifesaver.

The_Federov · #17 02-22-2011, 06:05 AM

Graal has a Bible? :o

Crow · #18 02-22-2011, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Federov

Graal has a Bible? :o

Holy Grails only ever come with Holy Bibles.

Crono · #19 02-22-2011, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stefan

We don't plan to enable the Wiki for non-gold players, there would be too many potentional hijack problems.

Yes, classic accounts will hijack your wiki while gold players won't.

The_Federov · #20 02-22-2011, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

Yes, classic accounts will hijack your wiki while gold players won't.

Yes, people who have played for AT LEAST four years are more likely to ruin the wiki, than people who just found graal.

Matt · #21 02-22-2011, 07:37 PM

I support a classic-enabled wiki.

Demisis_P2P · #22 02-22-2011, 09:04 PM

Nope. Stop trying to trick Stefan you guys.

Door · #23 02-22-2011, 11:47 PM

Yeah stop trying to trick Stefan into employing 100% free advertisement and community-building via wiki. He knows it's a trick because he makes WAY more money when the wiki can only be accessed by gold-subscription players. I for one pay every month just so I can contribute to the Graal Bible!

fowlplay4 · #24 02-23-2011, 12:44 AM

Someone should buy graalbible.com, clone wiki.graal.net on to it, and open the gates to those who want to contribute to the graal wiki.

Fulg0reSama · #25 02-23-2011, 12:46 AM

If the site is the graal bible; where is the church?

cyan3 · #26 02-23-2011, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

If the site is the graal bible; where is the church?

On Dustari...

The_Federov · #27 02-23-2011, 02:00 AM

Where dose the molest-i mean priest liv?

MattKan · #28 02-23-2011, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

On Dustari...

didn't harry potter burn the church a few months ago ?_?

Sinkler · #29 02-26-2011, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

If the site is the graal bible; where is the church?

and Synagogue

Crono · #30 02-26-2011, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sinkler

and Synagogue

omg equality mosque too!!1

Jiroxys7 · #31 02-28-2011, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

Graal Bible should be Classic-enabled

graal.net should be brought back. the snippet gallery was awesome..
But now it redirects to your silly little bible o3o

actually I don't mind the bible. but graal.net was still fun.

Matt · #32 02-28-2011, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiroxys7

graal.net should be brought back. the snippet gallery was awesome..
But now it redirects to your silly little bible o3o

actually I don't mind the bible. but graal.net was still fun.

graal.net was outdated.

cbk1994 · #33 02-28-2011, 10:56 PM

I really wish the Graal Bible was classic-enabled so I could post about all these wonderful Era updates...

xAndrewx · #34 02-28-2011, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I really wish the Graal Bible was classic-enabled so I could post about all these wonderful Era updates...

lol

DustyPorViva · #35 02-28-2011, 11:57 PM

I wish someone would fix this page: http://wiki.graal.net/index.php/Crea...side_Functions

Someone decided it'd be a good idea to split the clientside functions page into two. That itself is a bad idea(makes using find twice the work) but then embedded the link into the code section, so it doesn't actually link... and it's not the full link so you have to stitch them together.

SOMEONE PLEASE FIX THIS. It's been like this for a long time.

fowlplay4 · #36 03-01-2011, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

I wish someone would fix this page: http://wiki.graal.net/index.php/Crea...side_Functions

Someone decided it'd be a good idea to split the clientside functions page into two. That itself is a bad idea(makes using find twice the work) but then embedded the link into the code section, so it doesn't actually link... and it's not the full link so you have to stitch them together.

SOMEONE PLEASE FIX THIS. It's been like this for a long time.

Well from what I witnessed it was a Wiki/Browser constraint, the preview wouldn't work with the two sections pasted in together. It would just blank out.

Combined the two, got rid of the list of GUI Objects and instead pointed it to the GUI Control (and includes the same information) section that is very well documented compared to the rest of the wiki.

Demisis_P2P · #37 03-01-2011, 07:42 AM

I'd be willing to make a new account and subscribe it and give it to you guys to edit the wiki with?
If it gets banned from the client for account sharing can it still be used to edit the wiki?

Also the account would be named Julian_Assange.