RC image pack

DustyPorViva · #1 09-15-2009, 10:17 PM

Here are all the images used on RC that are apparently compiled into the program itself(so inaccessible unless you rip them, which with buttons means you lose out on parts of like the background).

Liberated · #2 09-16-2009, 07:30 AM

and if they're compiled into the program it's not possible to modify them and put them back in? And if it is, how?

DustyPorViva · #3 09-16-2009, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liberated

and if they're compiled into the program it's not possible to modify them and put them back in? And if it is, how?

You can skin RC by configuring control2config.txt in your RC folder.

Clockwork · #4 09-16-2009, 09:38 AM

Here's the RC I use/made. :o

Just extract the .zip into your graal folder (same place where the .exe is found) and choose yes if it asks you to overwrite.

Luda · #5 09-16-2009, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clockwork

Here's the RC I use/made. :o

Just extract the .zip into your graal folder (same place where the .exe is found) and choose yes if it asks you to overwrite.

awesome

cbk1994 · #6 09-16-2009, 12:44 PM

There are some really cool skinned ones; I know Tig has a great one he uses.

I prefer the non-graphic one myself, though

.

Stephen · #7 09-16-2009, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I prefer the non-graphic one myself, though

.

Absolutely.

Umat · #8 09-16-2009, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clockwork

Here's the RC I use/made. :o

Just extract the .zip into your graal folder (same place where the .exe is found) and choose yes if it asks you to overwrite.

I love it! I have already installed it.

cyan3 · #9 09-16-2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

There are some really cool skinned ones; I know Tig has a great one he uses.

I prefer the non-graphic one myself, though

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

Absolutely.

I agree, the none graphical rc is more efficient and organised.

Pimmeh · #10 09-16-2009, 04:35 PM

Could someone post a screenshot of what the no-graphic one looks like?

Crow · #11 09-16-2009, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

effichant and orgonised

cyan3 · #12 09-16-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow

In my opinion it is because the text area is larger and the controls are ordered into menus.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pimmeh

Could someone post a screenshot of what the no-graphic one looks like?

Tigairius · #13 09-16-2009, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

In my opinion it is because the text area is larger and the controls are ordered into menus.

So bland and boring

Crow · #14 09-16-2009, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

In my opinion it is because the text area is larger and the controls are ordered into menus.

Was referring to the grammar actually

Stephen · #15 09-16-2009, 07:44 PM

The graphics consume too much space, needlessly. I prefer organized menus to an array of buttons - especially since menus use less space.

DustyPorViva · #16 09-16-2009, 07:49 PM

I honestly don't care about space, all I like is how I can click a button and go right to where I need to go.

Luda · #17 09-16-2009, 07:52 PM

use mine

Crono · #18 09-16-2009, 08:00 PM

I prefer atrractive windows to boring ones, having graphics and buttons seems like a step forward from all menus to me.

cyan3 · #19 09-16-2009, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow

Was referring to the grammar actually

It was a minor error and we all do them every so often. I would have found it before the post if I were using my Linux Firefox but I was using my Windows version which doesn't have the plugin for spell checking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigairius

So bland and boring

If I'm using RC to chat or the file browser I use the graphical RC but if I'm doing development work I tend to use the none graphical version more often.

Crow · #20 09-16-2009, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

It was a minor error and we all do them every so often. I would have found it before the post if I were using my Linux Firefox but I was using my Windows version which doesn't have the plugin for spell checking.

You know, you still got "orgonised" up there

cyan3 · #21 09-16-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow

You know, you still got "orgonised" up there

Must have slipped my mind. I've changed it to organised now.

Rufus · #22 09-16-2009, 08:43 PM

Nice resource. Maybe someone with gold should write a wiki article on how to skin your RC client (if there isn't one already) and link to here.

SwimChao · #23 09-16-2009, 10:06 PM

I've always been curious of this:

For some period of time, my computer has had troubles loading the graphical mode of RC. Does anyone have an explanation to this?

DustyPorViva · #24 09-16-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwimChao

I've always been curious of this:

For some period of time, my computer has had troubles loading the graphical mode of RC. Does anyone have an explanation to this?

Read through here:
http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=86422

SwimChao · #25 09-16-2009, 10:26 PM

Thanks! I remember reading the "why" a while back, but completely forgot. Never thought of double short cutting, though.

TSAdmin · #26 09-17-2009, 04:00 AM

I am loving the great graphics and all of that involved in customising the Graphical Menu!

I'll never give up my organised, uncluttered "boring" style. I agree it is boring, but that's a small price for proper organisation and ease of use. On a personal note (ie: I'm not disputing the 1-click ability), unless the images carried a text label on them without having to hover over them to be sure I'm clicking the right button, I'd be up the creek without a paddle for a long time trying to get used to it. I do much prefer the non-graphical for this reason as well (The 1-line text).