Worst Modern Server

[Stryke]

What do you think is the overall worst modern server you have played on Graal?

[pig132]

graal ghetto

[Elizabeth]

graal ghetto

[Novice]

Graal Ghetto and Utopia comes close with it's abuse.

[cbk1994]

Sands of Glory was not modern

[kia345]

All of the above (even though I vaguely remember SoG as not sucking (even though I only vaguely remember it))

[Rufus]

Same ****, different name.

[Hiro]

all of them are awful.

[fowlplay4]

You're a negative **** for making this thread.

[Seich]

Most definitely and without a doubt... Graal Ghetto.

[cbk1994]

I'd honestly say Graal Ghetto is no worse than Kriegzone or Utopia (though Utopia's scripts were pretty kickass), it's probably just getting all the "worst" votes because it's still around.

[Knightmare1]

SoG. loljk Graal Ghetto/ Utopia

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by Knightmare1

SoG. loljk Graal Ghetto/ Utopia

[Matt]

Graal Ghetto

[Knightmare1]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

i posted that just cuz i knew you were online.

[Crono]

Wanted to vote for all but Era.

[papajchris]

SoG is/was my favorite server, because it was crazy fun

[CharlieM]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I'd honestly say Graal Ghetto is no worse than Kriegzone or Utopia (though Utopia's scripts were pretty kickass), it's probably just getting all the "worst" votes because it's still around.

I wonder why the scripts were awesome

[MysticX2X]

I don't see Graal X on here. I refuse to vote.

[DuBsTeRmAn]

Graal Ghetto / Utopia

[kia345]

To be completely fair, Era is the worst.


Because it encourages all of the other ones.

[Xterminator]

All of the Above except SoG.
SoG was crazy fun .

[Frankie]

they're all pretty bad except for Era, and maybe Sands of Glory since from what I remember it was very unique.

the only people that voted for Era are probably people that have worked for one of these knock-off servers or have dumb logic. (like Kia)

[CharlieM]

Frankie Era isn't that amazing, your just thinking its the best because you were staff on it. Too be honest the under development servers have more potential then era, if they could just get their act together.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

Frankie Era isn't that amazing, your just thinking its the best because you were staff on it. Too be honest the under development servers have more potential then era, if they could just get their act together.

where did I say Era was amazing? it may not be the greatest server but it's not bad at all. it's certainly not the worst modern server either.

Era's on the classic tab.
Era's has 70 - 80+ players at peak times and even hits 100+ quite often.
Era has been around 3 times as long as majority of today's private modern servers.

I'm pretty sure right there proves that all these rip-offs can't top Era. I don't see why anyone would vote it as the worst server when clearly it's the only successful modern server to date. you must have your head pretty far up your ass to say that.

I do agree that other modern servers can have potential, but it's too bad they'll never make it. don't go saying that they have more potential than Era until they prove that they do by getting on the classic tab and beating Era's player count daily.

would you say call of duty 5 is bad because it encouraged atrius: world at war? I wouldn't really think so. it's really stupid logic.

[Elk]

Atrius

Horrible sprites and no pixelart at all.
Ugly.

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by Elk

Atrius

Horrible sprites and no pixelart at all.
Ugly.

Everything is ugly compared to what you can do.

[Mark Sir Link]

Era

[CharlieM]

Originally Posted by Frankie

where did I say Era was amazing? it may not be the greatest server but it's not bad at all. it's certainly not the worst modern server either.

Era's on the classic tab.
Era's has 70 - 80+ players at peak times and even hits 100+ quite often.
Era has been around 3 times as long as majority of today's private modern servers.

I'm pretty sure right there proves that all these rip-offs can't top Era. I don't see why anyone would vote it as the worst server when clearly it's the only successful modern server to date. you must have your head pretty far up your ass to say that.

I do agree that other modern servers can have potential, but it's too bad they'll never make it. don't go saying that they have more potential than Era until they prove that they do by getting on the classic tab and beating Era's player count daily.

would you say call of duty 5 is bad because it encouraged atrius: world at war? I wouldn't really think so. it's really stupid logic.

Refer to it as Atrius the world at war thing is stupid imo,

Era is on the Classic tab yes, but a lot of servers came around the same time as Era or before Era made Classic even,

I remember the first time Atrius went hosted it beat out Eras playercount, until it got shut down by Era staff.

Now its been going so long it just keeps getting degraded by new staff that dont have a clue at what they are doing

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

I wonder why the scripts were awesome

I wrote them, of course

[LordSquirt]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

Refer to it as Atrius the world at war thing is stupid imo,

Era is on the Classic tab yes, but a lot of servers came around the same time as Era or before Era made Classic even,

I remember the first time Atrius went hosted it beat out Eras playercount, until it got shut down by Era staff.

Now its been going so long it just keeps getting degraded by new staff that dont have a clue at what they are doing

When any server gets reset more players would tend to play the server. For example, if we reset Era right now everyone would have an equal chance to be the richest and etc. That would encourage a lot of players to play the server and they most likely are going to work on the server a lot to try to get the most items and money. It doesn't matter if a server at first is a big hit, it matters if the server can sustain it's playercount over a long period of time. Look at Graal Ghetto for example. It used to have 60 people+ at this CURRENT time it's playercount is 0. What a surprise!

[salesman]

Originally Posted by LordSquirt

When any server gets reset more players would tend to play the server. For example, if we reset Era right now everyone would have an equal chance to be the richest and etc. That would encourage a lot of players to play the server and they most likely are going to work on the server a lot to try to get the most items and money. It doesn't matter if a server at first is a big hit, it matters if the server can sustain it's playercount over a long period of time. Look at Graal Ghetto for example. It used to have 60 people+ at this CURRENT time it's playercount is 0. What a surprise!

Yea if we reset Era, the playercount would probably hit 200 for a few days...the trick is keeping it that high.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

Refer to it as Atrius the world at war thing is stupid imo,

Era is on the Classic tab yes, but a lot of servers came around the same time as Era or before Era made Classic even,

I remember the first time Atrius went hosted it beat out Eras playercount, until it got shut down by Era staff.

Now its been going so long it just keeps getting degraded by new staff that dont have a clue at what they are doing

the only reason why I included the "world at war" part in atrius' name because I was comparing it to call of duty 5. just wanted to clarify.

it doesn't matter what servers were made when era was made. I don't see how this relates to the argument at all. we're talking about modern servers here. I understand that there were other servers before era, but era was the first to introduce a modern theme.

just because atrius beat era's player count a handful of times does not instantly make it better. we've seen graal ghetto reach high numbers past era. does that make them better than era? not really. after all the hype runs out people will return to their original servers and there won't be any more than like 20 people on atrius. (half the player count is probably staff and RC too)

[DustyPorViva]

Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

[Codein]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

D: I know what you mean.

[FaLLChiLD]

SoG shouldn't be on this list (due to "modern"). Graal X should be there instead.

Nice to see SoG has received 0 votes though since it is on the list!

[Angel_Light]

Well this has become a bashing/negative thread about Graal Ghetto

[Pelikano]

Originally Posted by Angel_Light

Well this has become a bashing/negative thread about Graal Ghetto

why can't the graal community take facts

[CharlieM]

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

Yeah, Someone bugged that a while back when they were editting it I will change it right now so that it won't overwrite

[DustyPorViva]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

Yeah, Someone bugged that a while back when they were editting it I will change it right now so that it won't overwrite

If you're using that format for your heads, you'll have to change them all.