Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSolider
Correction, you have to get into the spar tournament. The part before is a qualification round, where you do have to race to pm or reach a location first or second.
|
We keep going back and fourth where we keep repeating ourselves. If all the higher admins agree that 4 chances was a bit too much, why are you defending it? Even Night agreed and it was a good enough playercount too (40 players, only 3-4 rc's on, and many players logging in and out). I wasn't whining to him either but we). The # of gc's might not even be the issue considering Jade got 6 chances last month. Sue me for not noticing but nobody complained then.
Also can you stop ****ing saying I want the tourney changed up? I dropped that idea even before this whole debate. That wasnt my point at all yet you keep thinking it is.
Quote:
|
Correction, the main tournament is an elimination tournament. The part before is a qualification round, where you have to get in in order to try and qualify.
|
Main tournament is elimination, but qualifications is also called "pre elimination" meaning we eliminate some people from the tournament, not giving them teh same chance.
Quote:
|
I find it ironic that you try to insult me by calling me a communist, and yet here you are suggesting we should limit people. I also find it ironic that you tell me I don't deserve to live in America when I'm stating people should have the freedom to qualify as many times as they get in.
|
Remind me whenever we followed a political system. I believe what is fair for all and I believe what the true meaning of something is exactly what it should stick to.
Quote:
|
So the fact that we did this in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 means we totally can't do this in 2009 because classic is.....so much different now?
|
It's called stop living in the past. It's what you and a lot of people should do. Refer to all these "bring back gta" threads.
Quote:
|
Let me correct a few things. First off, Karl Marx's theories are the basis of socialism. Communism is a radical spin off of those ideas. Second off, lets put this in context. When you're a peasant farmer in the lower class of society, when a man comes around preaching about everyone being in an equal middle class....aren't you doing to ****ing support it? Communism is one of those ideas that looks great on paper (everyones equal) but doesn't work well in practice. The reason it doesn't work well is that when inexperienced people try to manage a nation's economy...yeah...it doesn't work out. But the notion of everyone being equal appealed to nations with large peasant farmer populations such as China, Russia, and Vietnam. Third off, Chernobyl was in Ukraine. Russian cities got some fallout, but it's not like in Fallout 3. Fourth off, this entire argument is opinionated. People are naturally inclined to think their opinion is correct. I think that Stalin was more influential because his country, Russia, became a super power under his leadership after ww2. It wasn't a superpower before. Stalin's 5 year plans and massive industrialization projects turned a nation of peasant farmers into an industrial power. This industry was instrumental in eventually defeating nazi germany. India, once freed of british control, didn't really go anywhere. Still hasn't. Is a country that kills its people voluntarily in order to maintain control better than a country that involuntarily kills its people out of neglect and thus ignores massive famine? That's up for debate.
|
For one, Marx based his ideas off socialism. His ideas are communism hence why he is called "the father of communism. Marx had a unique idea of thinking, but this is not what we consider freedom of the people.
For two, Socialism was only a set of economic ideas.
For three, Communism was based off socialism except with politial ideas as well.
For four, Chernobyl power plant was controlled by the USSR. Who gives a **** really where it occurred. It was the fault of the government.
Quote:
|
Look duda. You think gandhi was more historically influential and I'm not going to convince you otherwise. I think stalin was more historically influential and you're sure as hell not going to convince me otherwise. Let's drop this opinionated portion and focus on the matter at hand.
|
Yeah we can't convince each other, but the whole world is convinced Gandhi had a more positive effect.
Also how did Clel saying he likes working by himself, go to picking jade first, then going to kicking laggers? Wtf mate?