Rate Please

Crono · #1 08-27-2006, 06:42 PM

I actually made this a while back but never posted it. Atleast I don't think I did.

Please rate/post comments on how to improve, etc.

xXziroXx · #2 08-27-2006, 06:48 PM

I like it, simple but appealing. 8/10.

Codein · #3 08-27-2006, 06:51 PM

Excellent stuff, Crono

You should teach me how to make levels :o

zephirot · #4 08-27-2006, 07:02 PM

Nice, teach me how to do this :[, only thing I can't do ...

Crono · #5 08-27-2006, 10:01 PM

Thanks guys.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zephirot

Nice, teach me how to do this :[, only thing I can't do ...

Made a mini-tutorial...hope it makes sense/helps you.

If not AIM me @ CronoPker. We can do a 1 on 1 lesson.

Mafukie · #6 08-27-2006, 10:57 PM

Good stuff, 9/10 -1 for some filler detail, and the stone road being so perfect at the end. (nothing broken off)

killerogue · #7 08-27-2006, 11:03 PM

Crono you never cease to amaze me. I think I know who I can consider the 3 best LATs on Graal.

Galdor · #8 08-27-2006, 11:33 PM

looks good =) even tho im tired of that 6+ years old tileset >=O

Shaun · #9 08-28-2006, 12:30 AM

Nothing spectacular, and nothing inherently incorrect either.

I'd give it a B+

Chicken_l33t · #10 08-28-2006, 02:56 AM

Not very nice. I don't like the path fill and path itself is not great in parts. Detailing is nice, but overall it's not a show level. It's a plain level :o

Infernix · #11 08-28-2006, 04:49 AM

Agree with chicken, just a level to walk through =D...decent though.

Sulukra · #12 08-28-2006, 06:10 AM

I recall you posting something similar to that in one of my threads to give me some advice, Crono, but its still pretty good. The paths are extremely good, and the detailing is nice, since its pretty nice to look at. However, I would suggest using darker greens in certain places to give it a nicer contrast.

WanDaMan · #13 08-28-2006, 08:47 AM

Very nice =D

Crono · #14 08-28-2006, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infernix

Agree with chicken, just a level to walk through =D...decent though.

Yeah it was meant to be used more practically rather than my usual eye candy levels.

Codein · #15 08-28-2006, 06:45 PM

Pretty cool. Would be awesome to see a forest in this style on an upcoming server. It'd be awesome.

excaliber7388 · #16 08-28-2006, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Yeah it was meant to be used more practically rather than my usual eye candy levels.

I want eye candy

Anyway, not bad, the path was mentioned. I'd put more detail in the grass, but then again, who siad I was better at levels?!?

7.5/10
for making a practical level look gewd

Shaun · #17 08-28-2006, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codein

Pretty cool. Would be awesome to see a forest in this style on an upcoming server. It'd be awesome.

How else have forests been made..?

My impression is that masses of trees have defined forests in the past..

Crono · #18 08-28-2006, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

How else have forests been made..?

Examples of how some people do them...

bgumeny · #19 08-28-2006, 09:58 PM

Boo to ugly forests, every LAT should read this thread so they realize how it should be done.
Nice job with the level, its nice and simple the way levels should be.

Crono · #20 08-28-2006, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgumeny

Boo to ugly forests, every LAT should read this thread so they realize how it should be done.
Nice job with the level, its nice and simple the way levels should be.

Actually WanDaMan does a more amazing job.

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...chmentid=37430

bgumeny · #21 08-28-2006, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Actually WanDaMan does a more amazing job.

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...chmentid=37430

Wan does do quite an amazing job. He also taught me how to do cliffs the right way which was extremely helpful.

Shaun · #22 08-29-2006, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Examples of how some people do them...

That's not a forest. That's a couple solid lumps of trees.

Crono · #23 08-29-2006, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

That's not a forest. That's a couple solid lumps of trees.

Yeah but they use that kind of tree styling.

Infernix · #24 08-29-2006, 01:48 AM

Zz, I learned how to do trees by looking at the ****. I think you all should just put some money down on glasses like I did lol......though i dont wear em much.

smirt362 · #25 08-29-2006, 01:50 AM

I like it. It has a sort of natural flow to it.

Codein · #26 08-29-2006, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun

How else have forests been made..?

My impression is that masses of trees have defined forests in the past..

Yes, you're correct to some extent, smart arse, however there are several styles.

Crono's style (which I like) is different from mine or Wan's.

My style is different from Wan's or Crono's.

Wan's is different from mine and Crono's.

Each style still contains trees but we go about doing it in a different way. I don't tend to clump trees in small amounts - leaving space for tiling that would represent forest ground, Wan clumps more trees than I would, etc.

I know you're intentions were to show me up, humilate me and generally make me look like a ******* but you obviously misunderstood what I meant.

Shaun · #27 08-29-2006, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codein

Yes, you're correct to some extent, smart arse, however there are several styles.

Crono's style (which I like) is different from mine or Wan's.

My style is different from Wan's or Crono's.

Wan's is different from mine and Crono's.

Each style still contains trees but we go about doing it in a different way. I don't tend to clump trees in small amounts - leaving space for tiling that would represent forest ground, Wan clumps more trees than I would, etc.

I know you're intentions were to show me up, humilate me and generally make me look like a ******* but you obviously misunderstood what I meant.

I was just wondering if I missed something. A varying space between trees just doesn't seem to justify producing an entire server, as it appeared you inferred.