Graal - First MMORPGs, now FPS?! - Page 2

melissa1988 · #41 01-15-2003, 06:02 PM

A lot of them also think they are uber l33t as well.

Sir Pickles

tlf288 · #42 01-16-2003, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JrTerrorist
Scripters scare me, they're all like
"ONO! CLIENTSIDE4j00"
And they try to teach me but I jsut screw up

If you need help post in the NPC Scripting forums and I'll help you. I tend to be nice and help if I can.

Neonight · #43 01-18-2003, 12:25 AM

Now this is basically off of the point, but I have a question.

If 2D Graal lags fairly badly (i.e. 2k2), then how, exactly, is Graal 3D going to run?

ZanderX · #44 01-18-2003, 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Neonight

If 2D Graal lags fairly badly (i.e. 2k2), then how, exactly, is Graal 3D going to run?

Doesn't lag for me.

Admins · #45 01-18-2003, 03:59 AM

Well on wednesday there was real slow down by the network, but normally its more clientside (loading of the overworld map can take 2-3 seconds, people often thing that that is lag). Graal Kingdoms shows a lot of graphics so you need a good configured graphics card, but normally it should not be slow with a standard computer (I bought mine 4 years ago for 360$ and never had slowdowns).

funnylinkwantsbomys · #46 01-18-2003, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Stefan
Well on wednesday there was real slow down by the network, but normally its more clientside (loading of the overworld map can take 2-3 seconds, people often thing that that is lag). Graal Kingdoms shows a lot of graphics so you need a good configured graphics card, but normally it should not be slow with a standard computer (I bought mine 4 years ago for 360$ and never had slowdowns).

whats your fastest computer?

i bet its like 60795049 ghz

brock128 · #47 01-18-2003, 03:56 PM

I liked graal for classic. But now, classic is near-dead to stefan. I'm sure other people loved classic too.

Graal is classic. Not Graal 2002. Not even Graal 2001. Graal is Graal.

melissa1988 · #48 01-18-2003, 06:11 PM

It's cause they think all this new crap's gonna make 'em more money

Googi · #49 01-18-2003, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by brock128
Graal is classic. Not Graal 2002. Not even Graal 2001. Graal is Graal.

2K1 is just classic + bomys - playerbase now that 2K1's economy is dead.

brock128 · #50 01-18-2003, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Googi

2K1 is just classic + bomys - playerbase now that 2K1's economy is dead.

Classic had more quests.
2k1 was more economy base.

Okay, maybe 2k1 used to be classical, and good, but now it's definatally not.

G_yoshi · #51 01-18-2003, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by brock128
I liked graal for classic. But now, classic is near-dead to stefan. I'm sure other people loved classic too.

Graal is classic. Not Graal 2002. Not even Graal 2001. Graal is Graal.

You fit in nicely with Googi in that both of you are traditionalists. Get over it! I fail to see how you can even justify Graal surviving in a market that has pretty much left the 2D realm for 3D. Though there is nothing wrong with 2D games but they are far and few usually. Its easier and somewhat faster for developers to make 3D games rather than 2D games. This 3D engine may help to bring in more customers for Graal which in turn increases the potential for talented players to join. And by talented I'm refering to development skills such as graphics, NPC scripts, etc.

Unless you can think of a better solution that would generate more profit for Cyberjoyuers and more customers, I'd suggest you'd shut it