No, its not Graal related, I needed fast comments - Page 2

Jerom · #41 12-14-2001, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
I've been following, and the rules say that you can cuss(keep it down, though) as long as it is not sexual and racist remarks. That's all he's been doing, aside from the mongoloid-like remarks, whereas I am sure three-fourths of the people on the forum don't know what the word refers to.

Blade50 has, and is most of the time, purposely being annoying or offensive, you know it, and everyone who isn't blind and stupid knows it.
His n*** signature pointed out that word, and he did it purposely too.

Torankusu · #42 12-14-2001, 05:29 AM

Part of being the FAQ Chief is being able to remove people from FAQ. There is no needed reason. If I had blackmailed you, however, that would've been wrong.

Blade50 · #43 12-14-2001, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

And is if you don't do act out worser things...

oh... well, that clears everything up.

Blade50 · #44 12-14-2001, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

Blade50 has, and is most of the time, purposely being annoying or offensive, you know it, and everyone who isn't blind and stupid knows it.
His n*** signature pointed out that word, and he did it purposely too.

it was an anti-nazl logo, you ****ing idiot.

Jerom · #45 12-14-2001, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Part of being the FAQ Chief is being able to remove people from FAQ. There is no needed reason. If I had blackmailed you, however, that would've been wrong.

"Part of being the FAQ Chief is being able to remove people from FAQ."... yep

But in my opinion, you removed me for the wrong reason. It's too late for me to ***** about that, because I'm long gone away from FAQ now, heh.
Wouldn't I blackmail you to not fire me or something?... I don't see why you would blackmail me, then fire me...

Jerom · #46 12-14-2001, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blade50

it was an anti-nazl logo, you ****ing idiot.

That sig was sort of like an image of a child holding a gun in their hand, saying guns are bad...

Torankusu · #47 12-14-2001, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

"Part of being the FAQ Chief is being able to remove people from FAQ."... yep But in my opinion, you removed me for the wrong reason. It's too late for me to ***** about that, because I'm long gone away from FAQ now, heh.
Wouldn't I blackmail you to not fire me or something?... I don't see why you would blackmail me, then fire me...

Blackmail, as in "give me alot of gralats or I will fire you," etc.

Jerom · #48 12-14-2001, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Blackmail, as in "give me alot of gralats or I will fire you," etc.

Makes sense to me now.

Blade50 · #49 12-14-2001, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

That sig was sort of like an image of a child holding a gun in their hand, saying guns are bad...

that would be a good anti-gun image. you are stupid if you think otherwise.

Jerom · #50 12-14-2001, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blade50

that would be a good anti-gun image. you are stupid if you think otherwise.

No it would not be a good anti-gun image you sick sadistic... person.
Most sane people, want their children to stay away from guns... advertising a child holding a gun, wouldn't influence that children should not have guns. It would have an opposite affect...

Blade50 · #51 12-14-2001, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Most sane people, want their children to stay away from guns... advertising a child holding a gun, wouldn't influence that children should not have guns. It would have an opposite affect...

yes, i know everytime any parent sees a child with a gun, they are all for it!

Jerom · #52 12-14-2001, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blade50

yes, i know everytime any parent sees a child with a gun, they are all for it!

"Most sane people"

Blade50 · #53 12-14-2001, 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

"Most sane people"

yes, so if they saw a child holding a gun, they would most likely be offended and think about it. they would probably think something along the lines of "i do not want guns in the hands of mychildren... jerom certainly is dumb."

Jerom · #54 12-14-2001, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blade50

yes, so if they saw a child holding a gun, they would most likely be offended and think about it. they would probably think something along the lines of "i do not want guns in the hands of mychildren... jerom certainly is dumb."

You sir, are beyond help. *sings the Elmo song, and exits stage right*

Blade50 · #55 12-14-2001, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jerom

You sir, are beyond help. *sings the Elmo song, and exits stage right*

in fact, i recall a gun control commercial which showed a boy looking to be about ten getting a gun out of a drawer.

spanky7124 · #56 12-14-2001, 06:15 AM

That was against Violence not the idea of guns. He could have been getting a knife out of that draw. I seem to remember at the end of those commercials it stating stuff about how bad violence was nada about guns.

Blade50 · #57 12-14-2001, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by spanky7124
That was against Violence not the idea of guns. He could have been getting a knife out of that draw. I seem to remember at the end of those commercials it stating stuff about how bad violence was nada about guns.

no.

bb2k1 · #58 12-14-2001, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Blade50

yes, so if they saw a child holding a gun, they would most likely be offended and think about it. they would probably think something along the lines of "i do not want guns in the hands of mychildren... jerom certainly is dumb."

I don't think you'll be having children anything in the next... ph I don't know... 20 years maybe.

Spunky2000ca · #59 12-14-2001, 07:02 AM

Blade, I apologize, but all I have seen from you is sarcasm, and nothing to benefiet(sp?) Graal, or the forums for that matter.

Torankusu, as to you, I am less offended by you. However you aren't perfect, as no one is, but you seem to be less so. You insult people when you aren't provoked. And I have a feeling I will have a lot more bad feelings coming from you to add to when I didn't choose you as FAQ Asst. Chief.

Jerom, thank you for standing up for me, as I wasn't here anymore.

If need be, I will delete this thread to stop the flaming/arguing/insulting that is occuring in this thread. If I were moderator, I would be more thourough, but as I am no, I'll do what I can.

If any much more flaming goes on, this thread will be deleted.

I'm off to play Starcraft now. I'll check this thread later.

Blade50 · #60 12-14-2001, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spunky2000ca
Blade, I apologize, but all I have seen from you is sarcasm, and nothing to benefiet(sp?) Graal, or the forums for that matter.

all i've seen from you is stupidity.