voting for future moderators (?)

[Sam]

Originally Posted by James

Funny, I've heard that too many times. Customer opinion doesn't seem to matter, and that's why the game is in the shape it is today.

I've read that too many times. Graal the game is what customers pay for. The forums are NOT the product you buy with your subscription, it's more a kind of platform to interchange ideas and get informations about Graal.
The NGRT is a concession from Linux cyberjoueurs. But it's misused as spam trashcan.
As I said before we have many people using the forums for interchange ideas and a bunch of carper. Unixmad don't want to argue about that again and again. He has said, he don't accept troublemakers on his forums. some of the people could be happy he don't get in action, because they were banned permanent a long time ago.
Picking on Darlene is the worst you can do. Trust me: if Darlene quit her job (which hopefully will not happen) you will not be happier with his next Admin.
She is the one who always is trying to pour oil on troubled water.

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

I understand that. But in an environment where the moderators insist by following the rules down to the word, there are no unwritten rules. It's not fair. Unwritten rules are fit for a more relaxed setting where moderation is done with common sense rather than strictly enforced laws.

That's why people always asking us "show me where it stands that I cannot be rude... ect."???