Rudora - Page 2

Devil · #41 03-20-2003, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spark910

And about Koni its like NW (they process not the server) as Stefan feels it is good enough and could/probably will be a gold server so he isnt rushing it.

That.

Spark910 · #42 03-20-2003, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Devil

That.

Learn to read

the time was judged on how much the PWs have improved. PWA staff came on and looked around, if they felt it was impoving then of course more time is an obvious thing to do as it will be worth it on release.

Devil · #43 03-20-2003, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spark910

Learn to read

the time was judged on how much the PWs have improved. PWA staff came on and looked around, if they felt it was impoving then of course more time is an obvious thing to do as it will be worth it on release.

Well they should make a better judgment on how it is when they test it first, before it goes up to give them an exact time to be public, not a year.

Spark910 · #44 03-20-2003, 05:35 PM

Who are you to say how good or bad the PWA judging of PWs are? I think they know what they are doing. And Rudora, belive it or not, hasnt been up for a year, not even anywhere near half of one either.

PrinceDark · #45 03-21-2003, 04:51 AM

Quote:

I belive the time was judged on how much the PWs have improved. PWA staff came on and looked around, if they felt it was impoving then of course more time is an obvious thing to do as it will be worth it on release.

Wrong. PWA didn't have access to private playerworlds until recently. Angel was basicly logging on and saying stuff like "I will review your playerworld soon. If it pass you open up, if not I shut you down."

Quote:

Other PWs that have not improved as much were opened early as it was obvious they were not going to improve enough no matter how much time they have.

I won't say you're wrong or right on that. From what I see Rudora has not made any noticeable improvements. If what you say is true then Rudora would have been forced open like the others.
I could be wrong though even though I doubt it because lots of people use a ridiculous excuses of "oh you don't know whats going on in the background". From what I've seen it's usually a BS cover-up.
Although from some people you can expect progress because they have proven it over time that when they work they can produce some very good quality projects.

Devil · #46 03-21-2003, 06:28 AM

Oh wait, lol, Era 2 is in development, BRAVO is making something that will *kick eras ass* but the tiles and ideas suck.

JrTerrorist · #47 03-21-2003, 12:00 PM

god friggin dangit

Stop copying Era you unoriginal &^%*ers.

Think up your own ideas for once.

ETD · #48 03-21-2003, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JrTerrorist
god friggin dangit

Stop copying Era you unoriginal &^%*ers.

Think up your own ideas for once.

lol, origional ideas are a gamble... it's safer to stick with what you know works (which is copying already popular PW's, and trying to make them even better)

i mean, how many man hours does it take to make a server? would you use them all on a gamble?

i think my server is semi-origional.... yet not really origional as much as i'd like
=X
but i don't want to waist my time on something that people might not like...
(i am not saying people SHOULD copy other PW's... i'm more saying WHY they do)

PrinceDark · #49 03-21-2003, 05:06 PM

Not entirely true. If you take stuff that has been done already you should make huge improvements on them. Plus most of the playerworld should be original. Nobody likes playerworlds with the same content they can find on other playerworlds.

ETD · #50 03-21-2003, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrinceDark
Not entirely true. If you take stuff that has been done already you should make huge improvements on them. Plus most of the playerworld should be original. Nobody likes playerworlds with the same content they can find on other playerworlds.

lol, yea, the first part is what i said
=0
people copy servers which are successfull, then make changes to try to make it even better... it's a more safe way to make a server

only 1 problem... the servers online sux (mostly), and i think if they were sent in to be reviewed now, they wouldn't pass
=X

anyways, i agree... new servers 'should' be origional.... but like i said, who's going to put all that work into a gamble like that? not many people
=0

PrinceDark · #51 03-21-2003, 05:28 PM

It would be nice if they did make online playerworlds have to go through the same reviews because there are going to be playerworlds that are better and with the new pay system people will be able to put up any crap online.