Stefan and any other loyal Graalian read.

psichill · #1 01-25-2002, 10:52 AM

Okay I am tired of this! If we are going to have "police" on graal then we need to have "laws." And yes we do have "laws" like the "rules". Because I just saw Alkaren make a rule that if a stupid E.T. makes a hate crime "TAG" for survivor then the ******* "E.T." gets 500 rocks?? Now that seems un-fair because he will be fired and that will be one less person giveing out free money for cool games! And he won't have a chance at getting another job.

So what I am trying to convence you people on is, before Alkaren or any future police chief for a main server or "2001" should have to have the law passed.

A list of what I want for graal 2001 to be fair and non-corrupt.
-For every "law/rule" made it must be passed in a vote by people on graal.
-Each law tried to be made will have a 2 day limit poll. And the poll will be on graal2001 when you login (like classic's old polls. WHICH WE NEVER GOT THE RESULTS ON!) and one will also be on the forums. Which will be sticky so it will allways be at the top for 2 days.
-Police Chief will be voted on in the same matter as the poll for the passing of a law.
-Police Chief will have to run for it's job with other conponents. And there will be a set time it gets it's job for, like 6 months or less or something.
-The chief can run for it's job 2 times and no more.
-The chief will return to regular police when done.
-The conponents choosed will be all of the current police on graal from when the election starts.

That is about all I have for idea's. If you disagre or like them or want to add on the post away!

(I am not trying to hurt anyone's feelings)

Googi · #2 01-25-2002, 10:55 AM

-_-, That ET deserved to be fired.

And if we had rules like that, it would still be legal to steal rocks and scam you idiot.

Solareon · #3 01-25-2002, 10:56 AM

I think Police are Bad, ~kthxbye

TDK_RC6 · #4 01-25-2002, 10:59 AM

why does people have to call people idiots just b/c of there ideas, he does pose some interesting points

what if some one told henry ford that his idea was stupid, or told bill gates that windows was stupid, o god then i would be stuck with mac, o no, the horror

Googi · #5 01-25-2002, 11:10 AM

No, those ideas are terrible. They are only good for criminals.

AlkarenHyralt · #6 01-25-2002, 11:24 AM

I can't make the rule that they are fired, as that is out of my power. So I will give them rocks insted.

ZanderX · #7 01-25-2002, 11:26 AM

...

No offense, Ramsey, but most of those ideas are stupid.

The ET should never, ever have made a tag, and he should be fired, if he hasn't been already, and banned for it. 500 rocks is too little.

freddyfox · #8 01-25-2002, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by psichill
*Snip*

No.

I think it's a fine rule, we don't need any people abusing their powers.

Valder · #9 01-25-2002, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freddyfox

No.

I think it's a fine rule, we don't need any people abusing their powers.

That's right.
If I were still events admin and found out about this the person would be fired on the spot regardless of what the HRO or anyone has to say about it even if that person was a good events team. It's the NO TOLERANCE policy.

G_yoshi · #10 01-25-2002, 11:32 AM

I'd have to agree with Googi and Kamuii...

ZanderX · #11 01-25-2002, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TDK_RC6
why does people have to call people idiots just b/c of there ideas, he does pose some interesting points

what if some one told henry ford that his idea was stupid, or told bill gates that windows was stupid, o god then i would be stuck with mac, o no, the horror

Nothing wrong with Macs, *******. Macs are great.

I'm sure many people told Bill Gates and Henry Ford that their ideas were stupid; people always do that.

Valder · #12 01-25-2002, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ZanderX

Nothing wrong with Macs, *******. Macs are great.

I'm sure many people told Bill Gates and Henry Ford that their ideas were stupid; people always do that.

Macs are good Art computers and I'd have to agree with Symon on this. I'm pretty sure people told him it was a stupid idea.

_0AfTeRsHoCk0_ · #13 01-25-2002, 12:12 PM

Those rules are terrible. First of all voting on a Police Chief will just make it a popularity contest and the unskilled people will be the Police Chief. Secondly, you can still hold events for fun without insulting each other. Thirdly, these laws we have to vote on won't be fair. What is popular might not necessarily be right

Wing · #14 01-25-2002, 12:19 PM

maybe we could have something like the electoral college? (having representatives of the Graalian population vote, like 7 people be them and they must all vote on the issues instead of the players, but they will listen to the players ideas and such)
that are consisted of the regular players

like we could have a poll on a new rule, and people would vote and post their opinion on it, the 7 people would look at it, take their opinions into account and make a decision based on that (and what they think)

people could suggest ideas to the comittee and then there would be a poll about it and what I explained above would happen

G_yoshi · #15 01-25-2002, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by _0AfTeRsHoCk0_
Those rules are terrible. First of all voting on a Police Chief will just make it a popularity contest and the unskilled people will be the Police Chief. Secondly, you can still hold events for fun without insulting each other. Thirdly, these laws we have to vote on won't be fair. What is popular might not necessarily be right

Methinks Captain Obvious wins this one

psichill · #16 01-25-2002, 12:29 PM

no one likes my ideas..

nyghtGT · #17 01-25-2002, 04:00 PM

See the reason I don't play 2001
anymore is because people don't think
enough. I mean its one thing when you
ask someone to hold an event, then
they switch to a Police tag. The problems
resolutions are not making more rules,
instead, by making more careful choice, of
who runs certain staff departments ...

Slaktmaster · #18 01-25-2002, 06:25 PM

Sorry, but that was stupid, Ramsey. Alkaren is doing a great job.

Funkee · #19 01-25-2002, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Solareon
I think Police are Bad, ~kthxbye

I AGREE SO LIkE YA

IceFire_TK · #20 01-25-2002, 06:44 PM

Lyndzey · #21 01-25-2002, 07:39 PM

I agree with some of these points. We used to have polls, yet everyone would tell their friends to vote for them, and it was a popularity contest. I think the Police force is good, with a few flaws that can be easily fixed. What ever happened to (Harmonia Police) and things like that?

AlkarenHyralt · #22 01-25-2002, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lyndzey
I agree with some of these points. We used to have polls, yet everyone would tell their friends to vote for them, and it was a popularity contest. I think the Police force is good, with a few flaws that can be easily fixed. What ever happened to (Harmonia Police) and things like that?

contego happened.

Googi · #23 01-25-2002, 09:53 PM

Well, I think 500 rocks is enough to stop someone from doing it again.

_0AfTeRsHoCk0_ · #24 01-26-2002, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlkarenHyralt

contego happened.

Isn't Contego gone? Why don't you just start the whole role-playing Police idea all over again?

AlexH · #25 01-26-2002, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by psichill
Okay I am tired of this! If we are going to have "police" on graal then we need to have "laws." And yes we do have "laws" like the "rules". Because I just saw Alkaren make a rule that if a stupid E.T. makes a hate crime "TAG" for survivor then the ******* "E.T." gets 500 rocks?? Now that seems un-fair because he will be fired and that will be one less person giveing out free money for cool games! And he won't have a chance at getting another job.

So what I am trying to convence you people on is, before Alkaren or any future police chief for a main server or "2001" should have to have the law passed.

A list of what I want for graal 2001 to be fair and non-corrupt.
-For every "law/rule" made it must be passed in a vote by people on graal.
-Each law tried to be made will have a 2 day limit poll. And the poll will be on graal2001 when you login (like classic's old polls. WHICH WE NEVER GOT THE RESULTS ON!) and one will also be on the forums. Which will be sticky so it will allways be at the top for 2 days.
-Police Chief will be voted on in the same matter as the poll for the passing of a law.
-Police Chief will have to run for it's job with other conponents. And there will be a set time it gets it's job for, like 6 months or less or something.
-The chief can run for it's job 2 times and no more.
-The chief will return to regular police when done.
-The conponents choosed will be all of the current police on graal from when the election starts.

That is about all I have for idea's. If you disagre or like them or want to add on the post away!

(I am not trying to hurt anyone's feelings)

stupid stupid stupid stupid
hate tags = against the rules that you signed for when you made your acc so why should you be allowed these words in tags, even for a short time
and the only allowinglike 6months as police chief, faq chief etc is stupid too
why if someones doing a great job should we fire them?
look at Toran, hes been FAQ Chief forever on g2k1 (dont know if there has been other ones wasnt here from the start) and obviously hes doing a good job, cause he still has his job

Nastazio · #26 01-26-2002, 12:27 AM

I think briniging back the whole Police Sections and stuff would be fun. I liked it alot.

AlexH · #27 01-26-2002, 12:30 AM

yea i liked the police sections idea
it seemed more organised and sounded as though if it worked well would bring down scamming, hacking a lot

Googi · #28 01-26-2002, 01:56 AM

No, police sections made it to hard to get scammers and rock stealers jailed.

Psyker · #29 01-26-2002, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Googi
No, police sections made it to hard to get scammers and rock stealers jailed.