Quote:
|
Originally Posted by protagonist
*shrug*
RC is used for communication purposes and such as well. Sure you can use PMs, but that is slow and bulky for trying to speak to multiple people. Especially with GPs, who may have to discuss bans or jails.
In my experience, it leads to a closer community among the staff. Nobody feels left out.
Theoretically, LATs don't need RC either. They can just send levels to administrators. It's really a preference issue; RC is a useful tool to keep your staff coordinating with eachother easily. More RCs can streamline your operation, provided they're legitimate staff positions and not overdone (nobody needs 10 FAQs).
|
Seems strange you're the only global that seems to feel this way... We've been over before how the number of RCs should be limited. With "discussing bans and stuff" there isn't much of a reason. And you
CAN script /openban alternatives with comments and all. A stronger community between non-essential staff, and staff that actually work are, does what good really? Then you just have friends, one that has RC for a tool, and one that has RC to "bs" and goof around... I fail to see how that is useful. Nonetheless, you don't have to criticize everything. Sometimes you should just learn to say "thanks" or "okay" and move on. Whether or not you agree or disagree with this doesn't effect anything. Obviously some playerworlds will ignore it and continue what they're doing, and some will use it and be happy. I've already discussed with Spark about making this perhaps mandatory for non-essentials. GPs are debatable, but FAQs, and ETs don't really need them. If it comes down to mandatory use of such things (Spark and I agree on the abusiveness of /summon and how it is not really necessary), I will probably end up making an event NPC as well. Similar to GK's :tc I suppose.
-Projectshifter