Quote:
Originally posted by Divider
Guess? No, I know it does.
I know your going to attempt to try to tell me it doesn't, but that'll be like telling me 'hate' doesn't mean 'hate'.
|
^_^
I think you should try learning something about the language before you argue about it. Translation isn't as simple as you think - you can't plug a word into a dictionary and expect to be given a perfect analogue. And in your case, the mistake is really quite amusing.
Quote:
|
Anyway, have you nothing better to do than try and argue?
|
Considering the fact that you are currently arguing with me:
1) I don't think the word 'try' is applicable.
2) You're in no situation to criticise
Quote:
Originally posted by adam
Your actions may not have been as severe when they accused you, but you have taken action before.
|
Not quite the same situation. After they had been harassing me for almost a year, I told them to stop raising such issues in threads where they were not relevant. I wouldn't have objected if they discussed them in a thread made specifically for evaluating my performance.
In any case, you're missing the point. I'm not saying that they shouldn't take action. I'm saying that, if the following are true:
1) They consider such accusations unacceptable.
2) They
persistently made them in the past.
Then they are corrupt - having different standards for themselves and others.