Quote:
Originally posted by Blue_Dragn
I guess I understand but what I am wondering. Players who make servers are expected to have so much more to offer on launch. Not to just have "potential". I guess you can see my statement there, I believe it speaks for itsself.
|
Much more is required for the Classic tab than the 3rd tab and I really think all new PlayerWorlds need to start on that tab but that is my opinion and I do not speak for all the PWA on that. Unless a Playerworld is a really exceptional Playerworld the 3rd tab is the way to go. You don't need as much and you are still developing your Playerworld but it gives you the opportunity to see how the players will perceive it. I for one do not agree with jumping any Playerworld straight to the Classic tab but as I said I do not speak for all the PWA on this, this is just my thought on it.
I believe all PlayerWorlds need to be treated equally and fairly as regard the qualifications for them to be visible either on the 3rd tab or the Classic tab based on quality and content not on who they know. I have posted before I don’t have to like it for me to judge it any different than one I do like, just because I may not personally like the theme of it doesn’t mean it cannot be successful on Graal. I like a Playerworld to have much for the players to do and have good quality levels, graphics and scripts. I don’t think this is unreasonable to expect and we do have the responsibility of making sure Graal’s quality of PlayerWorlds are going up and not down. The 3rd tab is for the Playerworlds with potential and have some to offer but are not yet ready for the Classic tab with it's much stricter requirements.