Quote:
Originally posted by Lance
If a certain amount of arguably intelligent people were able to infer a certain thing from his statement, and if it happened that he did not mean to imply that, then there's sufficient reason to believe that his message was indeed unclear, and not "obviously clear" as you would have the rest of us believe.
|
But this is not the case. You're referring to a situation that does not exist. What has happend is what matters. And in that case, falsely accusing someone of their post simply because you cannot interpret what that person is trying to say would not be deemed 'intelligent' nor would
arguing about something as rediculous as that. I reread the post, and I try to think of how you're interpreting his message, and I can see where you're comming from, but all I get from doing so is the belief of false accusation. Let's take a second look at the post:
Quote:
Cool.
It's too bad I already have a profanity system, or I'd use this one.
|
What is not clear in this message? He's declaring that he has a profanity system. He's declaring that if he
didn't already have one, then he would use the other one. Where you're getting the assumption that he's saying that his profanity system is superior to the other one is beyond me, but I see no false interpratation that could come from solely this post other than from past conflicts.