Quote:
Originally posted by draygin
You really make this to easy.
Loriel, Birdbird, Kamuii, Jeff, Tseng
|
I am unaware only of when Loriel became in charge of the server - It hasn't been 'years' for the rest of them.
Quote:
Wrong once again please at least know what you're talking about
Originally posted by Stefan
About gfx: It's allowed to use gfx and scripts from Classic (?) and Graal2001, also it's ok to use the 3d terrain, picso.png and the trees from Graal Kingdoms.
Obviously that right there is more than 2 graphics. notice its Tree's No where did I specify all graphics on GK and regardless it doesnt matter in the topic on hand.
|
I'm sorry, I assumed you had the wit to also exclude 'trees', as they are not very important. Two graphics, and trees. There, are you happy now in your miserable incompetence?
Quote:
|
Only unlimited on 2k1 and Adventures if you really need everything spelled out for you. Straight from Stefan's mouth
|
You're making an interpretation too, man. You interpret 'using graphics' to mean mean 'using all graphics'.
Quote:
|
You're stating interpretations as facts,
|
So are you, buddy.
Quote:
|
facts that are clearly wrong in an attempt to mislead people.
|
Wrong solely by your interpretation.
Quote:
|
Which can easily be seen as an attempt to unnofficially change the rules.
|
Do you understand the difference between interpreting a statement and changing that statement? I don't think you do.
Quote:
|
Please make an effort to know what you're talking about rather than trying to mislead people with these alleged interpretations.
|
Alleged interpretations? I
really hate it when people use words they don't fully comprehend in order to sound more intelligent.
Semantics aside, I still don't see how you're any more qualified than I to interpret a rule
that relates to my server.
Quote:
|
I've proven you wrong any one can use 2k1 graphics until Stefan decides otherwise. Case closed court dismissed. *bangs gavel*
|
How presumptuous of you.
-
To summarize: you're attempting to argue with me not only that your interpretation of what Stefan said is inherently better than mine, but that your interpretation is fact, while simultaneously (and hypocritically) condemning me for the same supposed behavior.