Thread: UC Playerworlds
View Single Post
  #52  
Old 05-15-2003, 07:19 AM
_0AfTeRsHoCk0_ _0AfTeRsHoCk0_ is offline
Banned
_0AfTeRsHoCk0_'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,260
_0AfTeRsHoCk0_ is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to _0AfTeRsHoCk0_
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
I agree that some servers need to be inspected, but not all. You say that you proposed the idea, but what was the feedback? How long ago was this? Did he specifically say that all servers should be inspected? If not then it seems to me that you guys are outstepping your bounds.
I proposed this back just before I quit the PWA, you can even ask Angel. Stefan said that this was a good idea, but he wanted to release the PW's very soon, in a couple months. Then Angel and I (mostly Angel) went around pushing these private servers for information and asking them what they have done/expected release dates. Releases of Frolic and Gaia were the result of these pushes.

I think all servers should be inspected. I don't consider it stepping our bounds because we don't have the actual power to say "you're getting shut down, buddy, say goodbye" but we're merely an investigative and informative group to Nemesis and Stefan and Unixmad on these issues. It's a bit bureaucratic, but there is no way the three of them can get everything done alone if they have to do it themselves. If we started inspecting these UC PW's (which I plan to once I talk to Nemesis) then we won't be pushing for amazingly fast progress within weeks, we understand that everyone has a life and that ideas come gradually and slowly but enough to have something tangible and playable after a few months of work. I don't see why everyone is getting hyper-sensitive about this issue, because it would really be no different if Stefan came onto your playerworld and asked what you've been doing and how you are going.
Reply With Quote