Quote:
Originally posted by DenoriZakarum
i have a very good idea for speells, instead of replacing the weapon why not replace the shield? instead of holding a shield a spell caster must hold a book but u cannot use a melee wepaon while the book is out so that COULD fix the problem
|
So if you can't hold a weapon while holding the book, what difference would that make? As it is now, you can't hold a wand while you hold a weapon - your way, you won't be able to hold a book while holding a weapons.
I'd rather say the wand should only be necessary for attack spells, for as Stefan said people should know when a sorcerer is about to attack them. If someone't shooking at you, you want to see his gun, but if he'd just using the back end of his gun to hammer a nail in the wall you wouldn't mind not seeing it. Err... okay, bad example, anyway, who cares if someone casts a spell on himself, so there wouldn't be a need for a wand, maybe just a light to see that he did something... I better stop here before people who got my point start to lose it again...