Quote:
Originally posted by adam
If it were to stop there, then that's commendable, but not for you. Becouse she would have ended the argument, by not defending herself from your statement. As previously stated, it takes two to argue. And she ended it the one way possible, by taking a final blow
|
1) I did not say I should be commended for anything.
2) The 'final blow' was simply a correction of sorts. It was hardly a vicious attack, and it did not leave any room for counter-attacks.
Quote:
|
I am certain there were other options of defending yourself against misleading statements without attacking your opponent.
|
Attacking her? Hardly. How would you have posted the same message?
Quote:
|
If the situation were reversed and your opponents always responded to misleading statements with attacks, you would always attack them as well.
|
If they responded with attacks, yes. However, that is not the situation here.