[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by voicedcow6666
Just because you don't agree with someone, whether it be on logic or whatever, does not make that person an incompetent fool.

Again you fail to understand. If I percieve that you are making stupid mistakes then it is reasonable for me to consider you stupid. Is this too complicated for you? You're only strengthening my belief

And did you really believe that I was calling you a ***** because of the way you spell humor? Jesus dude, rofl....I was using it as an example.

Simply making a point, home-dawg. My reasons for doubting your intelligence are much more substantial than choices of spelling, so your argument was worthless.

Ok, you didn't outright agree that the majority of the people are juveniles, but you agreed of the possibility.

That's not an agree/disagree thing, it's just a statistical fact. But you've failed to state any worthwhile implications thereof.

And that quote, it is applicable. When the NPC was up, I didn't recieve one complaint of any kind about it (except on here).

You shoot yourself in the foot with the 'except on here'. Complaints on the fora are just as significant as in-game complaints. In any case, your experiences are inadmissable as evidence simply because there's no reason to believe that you're not lying.

The majority of the players on Delteria are in fact over the age of thirteen and do in fact have a mental compacity over the age of a thirteen year old (with a few exceptions, I admit).

Mental capacity and mental age are separate concepts.

None of these players had a problem with it.

Oh, you asked all of them?

To be straight up honest, I do not care about Graal nor it's reputation. My primary point of interest is Delteria and the Delteria players.

That's your prerogative, I was merely stating why it was not acceptable.

And not because posting takes so much effort, like with your smart ass reply.

...this seems to make little sense. If you reply to something, at least put the text to which you are replying. Otherwise I have no way of knowing what context you're assuming.

When WC posted this, he posted it with the intent to bring out the "bad" of Delteria, just like he does other servers. That's ignorant.

Ignorant of what, pray tell? He saw something that contravened Graal's policies and so he reported it. It's perfectly valid and understandable.

The NPC was not made to "rape" objects or players. How can you "rape" something on an 8-bit game? How can you "rape" an object period?

1) It's not an 8-bit game. You call yourself a scripter but you don't even know the word size of a standard desktop PC's processor?
2) We regularly state that we are 'killing' things in the game. How is that any different to raping them? Both simulated actions, referred to as if they were real simply for the sake of simplicity.

Yes, they could contact staff...if there's not someone on, then they can complain on our forums....it would be handled...

Great, but you have failed to address my other two points.

Have you never played Vice City? You can friggin pick up hookers! And it's a game...so boom, you failed....

Rape would be distasteful even in an adult game. Graal is not an adult game. Please read this.

And you first insulted me...in return I insulted you...you replied saying I had no justification....

Indeed I did, and indeed you did not.

I replied back saying neither did you...you reply saying oh it's humorous that I can say you have no justification to insult me while I'm insulting you with no justification

I didn't say that at all. You were saying that I should not criticise you without knowing you, yet you were criticising me without knowing me. I, on the other hand, do not consider personal knowledge of the person to be a prerequisite from criticism thereof. Understand yet, or should I use smaller words?