Quote:
Originally posted by Milkdude99
All I have ever done is speak from the long time posted Graal rules and if I am not speaking from the Graal Rules I speak for myself and never have represented myself in any other manner. If you read something else in my post then I am afraid it is your error and not mine.
|
The funny thing is that you don't realise you're proving his point for him. You refuse to consider your own fallibility.
Quote:
Originally posted by Soul-Blade
The clientr can be written by the server, read by the client...this allows prevention of clientside editing of client strings. By using only client strings, which is basicly the only thing possible to test offline, when going online it may work correctly but it is a massive security risk, as they can be potentially edited...
|
Indeed, and that's the problem that faces most playerworlds at the moment. It's possible to mock up a fake server thing to trigger etc, but it's a lot of unnecessary work. That's why I say private servers are the only reasonable solution.
Quote:
|
As for the one level thing...it may be possible, but with how efficient the graal engine is, it would require a super computer to run.
|
Not at all. The graphical demands could be scaled quite easily.
Quote:
|
Now on the other hand, using a gmap could possibly be considered one level
|
Indeed it could, but I wasn't talking about that.
Quote:
|
Once again, using script, I don't care who you are...I doubt it will be very fast.
|
It could. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about here.
Quote:
|
Few more things..Kaimetsu, that requirement should stay. Assuming you made the most amazing PW in one level, don't you think the PWA is able to see how great you one level PW is?
|
Well, yes. And then they'd throw it out because it doesn't fit the requirements. I'm saying that, if the requirement stays, it shouldn't be rigidly enforced. It should be more of a guideline than a hard law.