Quote:
Originally posted by Milkdude99
1. Cuts down on the Players submitting 50 level PWs done in 2 weeks and calling it the "Best thing that has hit Graal"
|
Agreed. It sets guidelines for the incompetent, but shouldn't also be strictly applied to the gifted.
Quote:
|
2. Makes the Players plan better for their PW because they have alot of levels to make and not just a few Awesome ones.
|
Again, I agree. But it should only be a guideline - the PWA shouldn't throw out a PW just because it doesn't achieve the 200-level minimum. There are other factors to consider.
Quote:
|
3. 200 levels has a better chance to hold interest to players when there is more to do and spread out more. Trying to cram too much in a few levels only creates a cluttered disorganized look to the PW. Not very attractive to the player.
|
That depends on the specific implementation. At peak times most servers have at most 100 players. At 100 levels, that's one player per level. At 200, one for every two levels. At 1000? Dude, you're just never gonna actually
meet anybody else. Shrinking the world allows us to bring the players closer together.
Quote:
|
I did not say or assume in any way less than 200 levels could not be a good PW, this is where you assumed I thought this.
|
No I didn't. You just assumed I assumed it.
Quote:
|
Sure awesome levels can be made under 200 and be quite playable BUT there has to be a standard
|
No, there doesn't. Why would there?