[Googi]

Well, look at it this way...

Now, there are only two reasons to NOT want this to be implemented, either it's because you use profanity, in which case you are breaking the rules, therefore, this is not a good argument.

The other reason that you may not want this put in, is actually a somewhat good reason, which is that it can block words which only have the sequence of letters which would be profanity as an alone word in them. (I.e. Assume, Roo***p). However, if this is well coded, then this is also solved, therefore, this is only a mediocre agrument.

So...

A profanity filter should be added.