Quote:
|
Am I the only one who thinks that kingdom mode is a bad concept? Most people on Kingdoms are actually in a kingdom, so I doubt there needs to be a special way to seperate rpers from non-rpers.
|
You are the only one, yes. Sorry.
Quote:
|
Anyways kingdom wars should be long, played out events, lasting maybe days or even weeks and involving many battles and diplomacy. Not just when a bunch of people agree to fight to see who is stronger.
|
This I agree with, but it depends entirely on the Kings.
Quote:
|
There needs not be a kingdom mode, only the other two (peaceful and battle). As for the bell, I think that a better use for it would be a sort of call-to-arms thing. Where as if a kingdom is under attack and "a king" rings the bell, all online members of the kingdom are transported to their island castle and tags are automatically put on. [/B]
|
Shoot NO! Are you crazy?
As it is now, we have two HUGE advantages:
1) We can have kingdom battles without fear of losing items or exp, and
2) Not everyone has to be a fighter! I RP a civilian who only fights when necessary (or when I've got a dern good reason to) and I would HIGHLY resent being warped around every time a King lost his temper! How you think I'd feel if I'd just set down a cauldron full of phosphorus and Zurk decides to warp us all to the castle?