Quote:
Originally posted by iniquitus
...we've been having lately are getting ridiculous, with alot of the PW's scrapping theire entire world and "re-building" as soon as they get a server...
I think all PW's should have to meet the same standards as when they are passed by the PW review team. If they fall below the standards, they should be given a warning to get their acts togeather within a certain time-frame, and if they don't, should be shut down.
Look at alot of the playerworlds we're having problems with today and ask yourself "Would this PW pass if it were submited to the review team in it's current condition?" The answer sadly, for alot of these servers is... No.
There should also be standards for Staff on a playerworld, behavior of staff, amount of staff to average player ratio, etc.
Every Playerworld should get a checkup and review of progress once a month by a global pw admin or something. This way we could make sure PW's don't fall apart and stay up for months longer then they should.
Just my 5 cents.
Urizen :o
|
I think that after a server gets put up, aside from being checked now and then by PW Inspectors, it undergoes another "test", where a PW Inspector will look at everything and determine if it still has the quality to be online. If his answer is NO, it doesn't have the quaility anymore, the server will get a warning.
Then the next month the PW Inspector-guy will come on and do it again. If the server had a warning last month, and it hasn't shaped up, then we have a friendly chat with the owner of the server discussing the future of it.
Just my 5 cents.
-Jinx