[Milkdude99]

ICQ is a piss poor example because it is a "chat program" and we are not talking about a Chat program....something you fail to see is , they provided the "means " for the "tools " they used in a illegal activity, this in itself makes them responsible, by allowing the link to the tools they need to hack Graal and gave out info on the ports which is also illegal... To run a responsible journalistic site to post "freedom of speech" you must also take responsiblity for it's content to make sure what is there is first "true and accurate " and not slanderous .. for this will make them responsible in a court of law as spreading malious slander..As the same goes for a newspaper , that is why they have a legal dept to guard the paper from this kind of thing. If a paper willingly prints lets say "top secret papers " of the Goverment something that will harm the defense of that country, do you still say they have the right because of "free speech?" Of course not , why? because it would be harmful to that said country , what is the difference here? What they "allowed to stay up " was indeed harmful to others and yet they choose to ignore that and let it remain and because of this fact are directly resonsible for the actions taken against Graal lanched not by one but by many because they allowed it to be "spread by their site". To be responsible Journalist they should have removed it from their site so as not to be involved with any illegal activity , whether directly or indirectly... This is my gripe with them and check with an Attourney and see if what I say is correct or not...