Quote:
Originally posted by Pinktaco
That is actually a good point, because people have different views on levels, one person likes more tiles(birdbird type levels) and another person doesn't like that type of stuff, more clean and empty(Konidias type), now if we have one person deciding all the playerworlds, it would just be what they like to see.. now if we had like 2-3 reviewers it would make it more fair in a way.
|
I agree.. pw reviewers should consist of about 4-6 people that all review the same pw individually without any other pw reviewers comments.. they write the review, and if more say "pass" then "fail" then they talk about whether the pw should go up and what should be fixed if it does go up.
PW Reviewing should be like olympic iceskating judging.. they even changed how that is judged recently because they say most sports are just a matter of opinion and judgement calls.. football is a matter of opinion when the winning team can be decided by a referee's call, most performance sports such as gymnastic and iceskating rely on a group of people's opinion.
I dunno if it's right to be able to fail a pw because you don't like the tiling really.. unless it's just awful and doesn't make any sense at all.