Quote:
Originally Posted by Crow
That's a very bad comparison. And whether it is positive or negative feedback, it should always go towards the whole team.
|
That's a very literal take on such an idealistic statement.
Since it was clearly missed, the point of the statement was that things are seldom as they "should" due to man's own incapacity to conform to any logical notion of what should or shouldn't be.
The reason behind that is that what should be is a clear matter of perspective.
You certainly wouldn't imprison the entire auto manufacturing company for creation of a faulty car that killed millions... or would ya?
No, you wouldn't because it is nearly impossible and impractical to properly distribute the blame to the many different components.
Contrarily, this case doesn't contain such complexities.
Since those to blame can be pin-pointed, why should they not be? Why should those who had little to no part or choice in it be faced with the brunt of its shortcomings?