[AllTheBaron]

Nothing in his response even hinted at the guidelines for an ad hominem.
You've been warned several times, do not use words or concepts without fully understanding their meaning. You make yourself look foolish.

If my initial statement is false, point out the incidences in his response that reach an ad hominem.

Secondly, what is your argument?
The comparison? It has been rendered null void.
The behaviors of different administrations? They are irrelevant due to the fact that it does not address the question in any which way. "It was done because thats how they do." <- That is redudant.

You've dropped the ball again, we'll give it to you once more; go.