Quote:
Originally Posted by kia345
No, there wasn't anything "wrong".
It could've been better though. A lot better. And if your reply to Fulgore was along the lines of "yeah, you're right, everyone has room for improvement, I'll keep that in mind!" then this thread would've ended there and no one would've even seen your post. Instead, you took it as a personal attack and flew off on him.
I've been bracing for "say that to my face and not online" since page one.
|
I didn't fly off on him. SO wait, you didn't read the topic or the initial post either? Seriously look at what the guy keeps saying for about 3 pages, and how I try to respond to it. Review this topic seriously... lmao this is pathetic. ::shakes head in disgust
No. I believe the ideas were conveyed perfectly, especially with the diagram to explain the mechanics of the games and scrim matches. Anyone still on the "ya could been write better" part just doesn't want to see anything come out of the topic. Honestly, I don't really care. Because the main thing is; that people read the first post and absorb the ideas I'm promoting.
Mission Complete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama
I promise you it's no act. I seem smart because that's a part of what you interpret from my responses. I'll be sure to change who I am just for you.
I'd say I'm above average (maybe..?). Also what's with you and flashy cars 
I guess I do seem smug due to my attitude, I'm just not very friendly so much 
@Pojo me too haha |
Probally because ur fat or something or ugly. (Why you ACT smart.)
The flashy car bit goes as, people who have flashy cars usually are compensating for something.
So '''People''' who sit on forums always looking for someones spelling error to side swipe them with "UR DUM UR DUM NOT READING LALALALLALALALLALALALAL" , usually means they got a C on the last math quiz. But it's like a whole other thing if they go on about it for like 3-4 days lol, in like 13 posts. Really smart people do sht like that bud, not Adverage, or Expected.
But my main point is that the 'Grouping of Idea's' , is fine as far as how it was writen. Becuase I proof read it over and over for hours to make sure it was as
COMPREHENSIVE as possible for extreemly complex ideas. When you finish reading, and looking at the example I provided. It should be fully understood. That's the main thing imo, idk about the structure or what ever excuses you're using to sink the topic.