
10-02-2010, 12:04 AM
|
|
Mr. Rayleigh
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United Kingdom, England
Posts: 2,148
|
|
|
Oh great i can discuss this now.
Why this is a bad idea:
- It doesn't solve the root problem and cause of this whole controversial thing. There is absolutely no guarantee that the new King will ever attract the members needed to avoid this sort of problem. The other Kingdoms are fairly sturdy and from what i know of my current Kingdom, no one is likely to flock to an unstable, disgraced (that is what this is doing) Kingdom.
- It leaves a wide stain on a proud Kingdoms history. Forests temporary removal wasn't that damaging at all, anyone with sense would know why it had to go, and anyone with sense now would know that Dustari might also need to go.
- Past, present and current members of Dustari are clearly not in favor of this. This ignores the wishes of the Kingdom completely, how can that be ignored?
Why this is a good idea:
- Potentially, more items would be redistributed into the economy, providing that offers are legitimate.
- It's arguably better than doing nothing |
|
|
|