Quote:
Originally Posted by Deas_Voice
why?
have you tried graal on linux vs windows?
linux is so much better then windows IMO.
sure, windows is a mayor OS, so what? it doesnt make it good.
dude, linux can run on like, ANY computer, try that with win7 with 512 mb ram  |
He said that Linux sucks for Graal, not that Linux sucks. If the Linux client sucks and isn't actively developed, then he's right - Linux does suck for Graal.
Also your Windows 7 argument is painfully weak. There are several bloated Linux distributions that I wouldn't put on anything less than modern. Likewise, I'm sure a stripped-down NT kernel could run pretty well on older, low-end system (2000 and XP can easily make it well beneath your 512MB limit).
And on that matter, 512MB are you serious? You say that as if an OS running in under half a gig of memory is some kind of accomplishment.
NPC Code:
[corey@sariss ~]$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3961 400 3561 0 41 193
-/+ buffers/cache: 164 3797
Swap: 972 0 972
[corey@sariss ~]$