Thread: Forum Upgrade
View Single Post
  #102  
Old 01-10-2010, 01:40 AM
DustyPorViva DustyPorViva is offline
Will work for food. Maybe
DustyPorViva's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 9,589
DustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to DustyPorViva Send a message via MSN to DustyPorViva
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneAngelIbesu View Post
I dunno. I have a really hard time believing that people aren't screaming for animated avatars just because they know they can't have them. I mean, I couldn't tell you the last time I frequently saw people use them, anywhere on the internet. The general consensus on animated images is that they're annoying. You can't even use them on twitter, like Loriel pointed out.
Even beyond the animation, the 70x70 limit and 20kb limit is extremely small. Even as a pixel artist, where I work efficiently with my art, I find that 1) 70x70 is really small, even for the most basic avatars(I had to cut a few pixels off from Door's avatar, even though it was 3 pixels is messed up the composition) and 2) the 20kb is insane. I know I've had a few times I wanted to make a small animation for an avatar only to be disappointed that Graal forums didn't support it anyways. Also, I'd like to see where you get this general consensus from, given that every forum I've browsed supports animated avatars.
Reply With Quote