05-25-2009, 07:54 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
 |
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 122
|
|
|
Same could be said about your proposal. Even if the balancing of guns could be point-based (senselessly more trouble than its worth) the same amount of thought, consideration and controversy would be existant.
What would be solved? Gun balancing wouldn't be any less difficult. Therefore the idea would solve nothing, making it useless. I'd suggest you not make underinformed or uniformed proposals. |
__________________
You manipulate people in order to get your way and I do not like it, I demand that you stop it." - Anonymous (lol)
Wil Soul formally known as BlasterX (The Intimidator) 
|
|
|
|