
04-15-2009, 01:55 AM
|
|
Gladius
|
 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 837
|
|
|
Concept of qualifications: if you get in, you get a chance to win your way into the tournament.
Keyphrase = IF you get in.
No, your argument not founded on whats right. Equal chance is what is founded on whats right. EVERYONE had a minimum of eight chances to get into a spar. ANYONE could have gotten into four spars, not just tatsumi. If ANYONE and EVERYONE can do it, then it is FAIR. Yes, tatsumi had a better chance because he had done it before. But ANYONE who had been in our spar tournament before would know how it works. First time players won't know how it works, so they're going to automatically be at a disadvantage. You can't do anything about that. Experience gives ANYONE an edge in a competition.
How come you can't get it? Everyone had the same ability to get into any number of spars. Anyone who had been in our tournament would have known exactly how things go. You can't punish people for knowing the ropes. You can't give 1st timers a handicap just b/c they're new to the server. You win our monthly by winning all your matches in the main tournament. How do you get into the tournament? You ****ing qualify. Just because some 1st timers didn't get into qualifiers, they decided to cry about it and apparently you decided to take up the battle standard. Why? Nothing is going to get changed because nothing is wrong. Everyone has the same chance to get into any of our eight summon spars. If they don't, then they can't qualify and thus can't win the monthly. Quit fighting a losing battle.
Do remember that the monthly (according to night) used to be 16 location spars. If that was still the case, then you would have an argument to make. But because we have summon spars, you don't. Anyone can pm. Not everyone can know a servers spar locations. Thus now everyone has 8 chances, and thus it is FAIR. Now shut the **** up.
E: If you do recall our previous argument (not that you read,) I had compared the countries several times. Maybe you should learn the definition of good influence. How far has india come since gandhi attempted to change things? Not very. How far has russia come since stalin took over? Oh lets see...a nation of peasant farmers was turned into a world super power. Look who's efforts actually made their country relevant, and you'll see that Stalin was more influential the gandhi kthx. |
|
|
|