Quote:
Originally Posted by Googi
So essentially, your argument for being server manager is something like "I'm going to revive GK. I'm not going to tell you how, and I'm not going to give reasoning for why my method will be effective, but you should just believe I can do it because I'm me."
|
You were discussing my development, and so was I. Misconstruing the nature of the conversation is fairly petty.
My interest in management is simply to secure control over my work, and to ensure a level of activity is maintained on GK - which we haven't seen for a long time. Although I can tell you now I would be very picky about who has access to development on debug - not for the sake of elitism but to ensure a high level of quality. I've already said I am not especially interested in managing, unless it's the only way to control my developments (and it doesn't seem to be the only way). But there is the problem that there is no one actively seeking it who is especially suitable, and of those others I feel I am among the more suitable.
I've made the options - as best as I see them - very clear but I'll do it again:
- Stefan manages while searching for a suitable manager
- Stefan appoints the most suitable from the current selection
- Bjorn is forced to return