View Single Post
  #15  
Old 01-16-2008, 10:52 PM
DustyPorViva DustyPorViva is offline
Will work for food. Maybe
DustyPorViva's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 9,589
DustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to DustyPorViva Send a message via MSN to DustyPorViva
I think the problem arises from mixing pay to play and pay for benefits(cash shop). Usually it's only one way or another... if it's pay to play, no one gets an unfair advantage because everyone's paying. If it's pay for benefits, people who pay have an advantage because they're willing to chip in the money... and it's justified because the game is most likely free, so how can you complain? Well, in this case, everyone has to pay to play(or at least, play without observer mode), but people still get to pay to get an advantage. It's mixing two cash-making methods into one, and I don't think it's exactly fair in a gaming sense.
Reply With Quote