[Draenin]

Originally Posted by Gambet

In no way are the two the same. You claim your method to be the best, while I just used the title in my review because I didn't want to think too much about a catchy title.

Isn't that what Googi did too? Perhaps I am missing out on something here.

Originally Posted by Gambet

Which would also fall into the category of corruptivity, what's your point? If the staff member is corrupt, do you think they'd care?

It's not a matter of whether they care or not. Point is that scripters being allowed to script their own tools shouldn't be allowed. Otherwise, you have Maloria.

Originally Posted by Gambet

I must disagree with you. NPC's only do what you tell it to given a certain situation, but not all situations have the same scenario, and there are always different cases where a player didn't actually break any rules. NPC's can't think for themselves, thus where the problem would occur. Not many NPC's, if any at all, are 100% full-proof and work exactly as they were designed to, with no bugs, no flaws, and no room for improvement. Not to mention the fact that it takes a human to script the NPC in the first place.

Tha'ts why you add onto them and improve their conditional actions.

Originally Posted by Gambet

So unixmad, being the manager of Graal and all, shouldn't enforce any of the Graal Online rules to its consumers?

Googi never made any mention of Unixmad enforcing rules. That much happening should be a given.

Originally Posted by Gambet

I don't care what reasons you may have, just the idea is ridiculous.

Because they don't coincide with yours?

Originally Posted by Gambet

And proposal five was also ridiculous to begin with.

Sounded pretty good to me.

Originally Posted by Gambet

Server managers should deal with rule infractions by any staff, not just GPs.

Agreed.

Originally Posted by Gambet

What do you think the GPs are for? If one GP jails someone, the person in jail can have their case reviewed by other GPs, and even the Chief if it gets to that point. There is no need for any help from the regular players.

I take it you didn't follow that sentence well. Googi wasn't proposing that players have a hand in getting someone unbanned. Just that there should be multiple GPs for handling situations.

Originally Posted by Gambet

The current word filters filter words that are not profane, but rather, have letters of profanity in them, but the meaning of the word is far from profane, thus making the word filter systems poorly done.

The system is not poorly done. Aggrivating, maybe, but not poorly done.

Originally Posted by Gambet

No, the staff are not regular players.

That's usually how they start out.

Originally Posted by Gambet

And your system does not supply them very effectively.

Ever tried it?

Originally Posted by Gambet

A lot of things have room for abuse. You can't always prevent it.

But you can still take precautions against it.

Originally Posted by Gambet

Does that make it right? Certainly not. That just means that the server manager shouldn't be server manager.

I can think of a few servers where corruption wasn't recognized, and it drove the server into the ground.

Originally Posted by Gambet

No, it wouldn't. This would take too much work for very little outcome.

I can't imagine the outcome being negligible.

Originally Posted by Gambet

No, you're talking about a staff organization system. A staff organization system would require the organization of developemental staffs' rights.

No, Googi's talking more about preventing staff corruption. That's why 2/3 of the idea proposal was aimed at non-developers.

Originally Posted by Gambet

And feel-good statements are far from meaningless.

Unless you're dying of leukemia, yeah, they are.

Originally Posted by Gambet

Each person should look out for one another, as would a family. All of the weight on a specific subject should never be held by one person alone.

Contradictory words, coming from one who certainly seemed to do just that not too long ago on Kingdoms.

Originally Posted by Gambet

But I thought the title of the thread was about a staff organization system? I must have been mistaken

You were.

Originally Posted by Gambet

Quite humorous how you tend to change the topic of your thread when you see me disproving your points.

Quite humorous how you're picking at Googi for changing the subject when you're the one bringing up all the stuff about FTP abuse in the first place. Googi has no choice in that situation but to change the subject in order to meet your words with a proper rebuttal. Quit laying traps you can't properly arm.

Originally Posted by Gambet

As I stated before, your system is far from perfect, and definitely not "the best".

Just like your review wasn't "official."