Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Malinko
Disruptive? You need an ass to disrupt the team to balance such biased efforts, which I do.
In addition, how does one member of the Playerworld Administration who inspects a world revolve around the other members? The ONLY thing that revolves around other members is to see if other members have inspected the worlds to have enough of a decision to pass a world, but we've seen that as it is with the current Playerworld Administration, hah.
Other than that, YOU can inspect a world on YOUR own time and just give it a fail or pass based on what is thought of the world, it doesn't interrupt work. Stop making excuses.
|
I think this was directed at me and I had to read it through quite a few times before I reached this point. I think I understand what you were getting at.
You are asking how can you be disruptive when the only way we effect each other is during an inspection, where all of us inspect a world?
Now, if that's what you're asking, you starting an argument here in the public forum is a good example of one of the many ways a PWA can be disruptive to another member of the team. Bickering with other members confuses people and shows a lack of professionalism and order that this job demands.
If you would like to discuss this with me any further you can forum PM me or contact me in the usual places. Going on any further would be both uninteresting to the public, and inappropriate in front of them.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darlene159
Oh, I agree fully that it should also be discussed with current PWA, but I don't think saying yes or no to hiring someone should be based solely on the pwa members opinions.
I think it should be all globals together discussing another globals hiring, for input and such.
|
I can respond to you and Andy on the same issue here: I agree with both of you.
I said all hiring to a team should be
discussed with the team, I didn't say everybody has to agree. However, saying "Lol, he's on your team now" and everybody being confused and irritated is a bad way to operate.
As for who it's discussed with: generally (while i didn't mention it) all the globals and prominent members of the community discuss new candidates for globals, which i comepletely approve of, and I think that should be our permanent policy for input's sake.