[Lance]

Originally Posted by protagonist

You haven't given a reason why you should keep it, either.

I'm the manager. That's a pretty good reason to start with, especially since you still fail to comprehend the whole burden-of-proof thing.

The fact is, you've had months and haven't done anything.

RC logs, files on Graal2001 Dev, and files on my own computer tend to indicate otherwise. The fact is that your claim is an opinion not grounded in reality. Also: you lack the capability to support your claim that I haven't done anything. Why bother pretending you can?

We don't care why, we just care that we still haven't a 2k1 server to play. The year 2001 was four years ago. Why is it that the server that was created in 2001 is "not ready" by 2005?

Yeah, just ignore the times Graal2001 was previously up and that things have changed since 2001. Great plan, Sherlock.

So I guess because a player made the request, it is a bad idea?

Pay attention. I said he was misrepresenting the request. And the request lacks the credibility when it is made by a player that it has when made by someone who actually has the authority to make one for real.

Because your position is absurd.

Opinion + no basis. You win x2!

Yet you'll let one of your cronies violently bash someone for this very same reason. You know, telling someone to "drown themself" is kind of wrong, isn't it?

I have cronies? Whoa, cool.

Is there supposed to be some corrolation between pointing out that percentages do not measure actual amount of work done and "telling someone to 'drown themself'"?

I guess statistics and probabilities are lost to you?

You can apply "statistics and probabilities" to something you admit knowing absolutely nothing about to state something about it with certainty? That's pretty damned brilliant.

It's not unfair to suggest that Konidias is working faster and more quality-efficient than you.

Where did I say it was unfair? Please stop arguing against points I am not making. I mean it's pretty cool that you can, but I don't see how it contributes to this discussion at all.

No entry found for quality-efficient.

Did you mean golden pheasant?

I wonder.

So far, the only screenshots we have are ones that show minute improvement. Conversely, Konidias has shown us interesting screenshots over a comparatively small amount of time.

The ones CheeToS and I have shown are minute improvement? Perhaps you ought to reexamine that. Perhaps you also ought to explain how "minute improvement" and "interesting" even fall into the same scale.

You do make such a fuss over competition, because then you have to work to keep your job.

You're arguing out of ignorance, buddy. You have zero knowledge about what has taken place on debug RC.

Want a pacifier to help you suck up?

1) To who?
2) For what reason?

By the way, you are doing exactly what you're accusing Koni of in the next quote:

I was quoting something he said - not 'remembering' anything.

Obviously, as it precludes the necessity to edit Rabid's post to remove what you deem as "cheerleading" (which is, by the way, a laughable excuse which will be reported to the higher officials).

His posts had content. Your one-liner cheers amount to spam. Report it all you want.

Well, you've failed at showing reasonable results for this work you claim to be doing. Seven screenshots doesn't account for so many months of what seems to be inactivity.

Except you still have totally missed the point where the only persons I am actually obligated to show my progress to are Stefan and unixmad, which I will happily do if/when requested of me.

I really must update that site.

You probably shouldn't waste the time. It is in violation of the vip.graal.net usage conditions and will ultimately be removed. Cheers.