Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
I've seen them before. All the 'proof' I've seen is people like you yelling that it's legal.
|
Players have scammed others since GK started. They have never been punished, and it's also been said by staff that scamming is legal.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
Irrelevant. If people can't find evidence then people won't be punished for scamming. If you believe that this is the case then why would you oppose Sam's ruling?
|
Until you can support your statement, my ruling stands. You want a rule to be put in effect that clearly has no way of prooving that you were indeed scammed. So, basically, it's just another rule to add to the 'rule book' that clearly is useless.
Besides, EVEN IF THERE WAS SOMEWAY TO PROVE THAT YOU WERE SCAMMED, why would it be illegal? It's in no way the fault of the administration. The past/present GK developers did a great job on making ways to prevent scamming. The rest is up to the players. Unless, of course, you want the administration to pamper the players, then by all means, go ahead.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
You're saying that this action would not be good. I'm asking for the criteria used in this assessment.
|
Once again, read what I've been saying. I don't want the administration to do anything on this case, so why would I have criteria on a good action? You can't have criteria on a good action if you don't want an action to be done.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
I've already explained this. Now specify your criteria.
|
Read what I said above.