Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
Hardly. Would you argue physics with a physicist? Most people tend to defer to those who are more knowledgeable than them, for fear of looking like fools.
|
No, you'd state what you think and they'd correct you. Then you come away knowing something.
Quote:
|
Aside from anything else, your definition of directed bias was recursive! How could it possibly be meaningful?
|
It was meant for those who know what bias is.
Quote:
|
Man, I was bluffing. I'm far too lazy. I'll just take some from your more recent posts, okay?
|
Heh.
Quote:
"No, it means to treat x in any way that is different than if there was no bias towards x"
Were.
|
I thought you mean argumentive flaws, not grammar errors....
but to counter: "Do you think you know more about the language than me?" Do you think
that you...
Quote:
"Your previous negative feelings, that is, thinking (and I admit sometimes I am) an arrogant person"
'thinking an arrogant person'? Nonsensical.
|
forgot the I am, whoops....
Quote:
"your fault, not that of my arrogance"
Arrogance is a fault. It doesn't have faults.
|
Most people will know what i mean, and such a fault is made by everyone constantly:
"But the assumption that I did anything stupid is born from arrogance."
This can have the same type of "misunderstanding" as the example you gave (if arrogance doesn't have faults, it doesn't give birth either)